Article 278 [263] ng Labor Code: Strike, picketing at lockout
Ang numero sa bracket, [263], ang dating numero ng article na ito bago ang renumbering ng Labor Code noong 2015.
Status: Inamyendahan
Inamyendahan
Inamyendahan na ang probisyong ito. Ang teksto sa ibaba ang kasalukuyang bersyon.
- Inamyendahan ng: Republic Act No. 6715
Ano ang sinasabi ng Article 278 [263]?
Nasa English ang opisyal na teksto ng batas.
(a) It is the policy of the State to encourage free trade unionism and free collective bargaining.
(b) Workers shall have the right to engage in concerted activities for purposes of collective bargaining or for their mutual benefit and protection. The right of legitimate labor organizations to strike and picket and of employers to lockout, consistent with the national interest, shall continue to be recognized and respected. However, no labor union may strike and no employer may declare a lockout on grounds involving inter-union and intra-union disputes.
(c) In cases of bargaining deadlocks, the duly certified or recognized bargaining agent may file a notice of strike or the employer may file a notice of lockout with the Ministry at least 30 days before the intended date thereof. In cases of unfair labor practice, the period of notice shall be 15 days and in the absence of a duly certified or recognized bargaining agent, the notice of strike may be filed by any legitimate labor organization in behalf of its members. However, in case of dismissal from employment of union officers duly elected in accordance with the union constitution and by-laws, which may constitute union busting where the existence of the union is threatened, the 15-day cooling-off period shall not apply and the union may take action immediately.
(d) The notice must be in accordance with such implementing rules and regulations as the Minister of Labor and Employment may promulgate.
(e) During the cooling-off period, it shall be the duty of the Ministry to exert all efforts at mediation and conciliation to effect a voluntary settlement. Should the dispute remain unsettled until the lapse of the requisite number of days from the mandatory filing of the notice, the labor union may strike or the employer may declare a lockout.
(f) A decision to declare a strike must be approved by a majority of the total union membership in the bargaining unit concerned, obtained by secret ballot in meetings or referenda called for that purpose. A decision to declare a lockout must be approved by a majority of the board of directors of the corporation or association or of the partners in a partnership, obtained by secret ballot in a meeting called for that purpose. The decision shall be valid for the duration of the dispute based on substantially the same grounds considered when the strike or lockout vote was taken. The Ministry may, at its own initiative or upon the request of any affected party, supervise the conduct of the secret balloting. In every case, the union or the employer shall furnish the Ministry the results of the voting at least seven days before the intended strike or lockout, subject to the cooling-off period herein provided.
(g) When, in his opinion, there exists a labor dispute causing or likely to cause a strike or lockout in an industry indispensable to the national interest, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may assume jurisdiction over the dispute and decide it or certify the same to the Commission for compulsory arbitration. Such assumption or certification shall have the effect of automatically enjoining the intended or impending strike or lockout as specified in the assumption or certification order. If one has already taken place at the time of assumption or certification, all striking or locked out employees shall immediately return to work and the employer shall immediately resume operations and readmit all workers under the same terms and conditions prevailing before the strike or lockout. The Secretary of Labor and Employment or the Commission may seek the assistance of law enforcement agencies to ensure compliance with this provision as well as with such orders as he may issue to enforce the same.
In line with the national concern for and the highest respect accorded to the right of patients to life and health, strikes and lockouts in hospitals, clinics and similar medical institutions shall, to every extent possible, be avoided, and all serious efforts, not only by labor and management but government as well, be exhausted to substantially minimize, if not prevent, their adverse effects on such life and health, through the exercise, however legitimate, by labor of its right to strike and by management to lockout. In labor disputes adversely affecting the continued operation of such hospitals, clinics or medical institutions, it shall be the duty of the striking union or locking-out employer to provide and maintain an effective skeletal workforce of medical and other health personnel, whose movement and services shall be unhampered and unrestricted, as are necessary to insure the proper and adequate protection of the life and health of its patients, most especially emergency cases, for the duration of the strike or lockout. In such cases, therefore, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may immediately assume, within twenty four (24) hours from knowledge of the occurrence of such a strike or lockout, jurisdiction over the same or certify it to the Commission for compulsory arbitration. For this purpose, the contending parties are strictly enjoined to comply with such orders, prohibitions and/or injunctions as are issued by the Secretary of Labor and Employment or the Commission, under pain of immediate disciplinary action, including dismissal or loss of employment status or payment by the locking-out employer of backwages, damages and other affirmative relief, even criminal prosecution against either or both of them.
The foregoing notwithstanding, the President of the Philippines shall not be precluded from determining the industries that, in his opinion, are indispensable to the national interest, and from intervening at any time and assuming jurisdiction over any such labor dispute in order to settle or terminate the same.
(h) Before or at any stage of the compulsory arbitration process, the parties may opt to submit their dispute to voluntary arbitration.
(i) The Secretary of Labor and Employment, the Commission or the voluntary arbitrator or panel of voluntary arbitrators shall decide or resolve the dispute within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the assumption of jurisdiction or the certification or submission of the dispute, as the case may be. The decision of the President, the Secretary of Labor and Employment, the Commission or the voluntary arbitrator shall be final and executory ten (10) calendar days after receipt thereof by the parties.
Basahin ang Labor Code sa website ng DOLE (luma pa ang article numbers doon, bago ang 2015)
Ano ang ibig sabihin nito sa simpleng salita?
Itinatakda ng Article 278 [263] ng Labor Code ang mga patakaran sa strike, picketing at lockout. Pinapayagan ang strike o lockout dahil sa bargaining deadlock o unfair labor practice, pagkatapos ng notice sa DOLE, cooling-off period na 30 o 15 araw, botohang secret ballot, at pag-report ng resulta hindi bababa sa pitong araw bago ito. Sa mga industriyang indispensable sa national interest, puwedeng mag-assume ng jurisdiction ang Secretary of Labor and Employment at pigilan ang strike.
Article 263 ang article na ito bago ang 2015 renumbering ng Labor Code. Galing ang mga talata nito sa Batas Pambansa Blg. 130 (1981), Executive Order No. 111 (1986) at Republic Act No. 6715 (1989). Hindi inilalarawan ng pahinang ito ang kasalukuyang rules of procedure ng National Conciliation and Mediation Board.
Paano ito gumagana sa totoong buhay?
Ang bargaining deadlock
Nasira ang usapan ng union ni Rosa at ng kompanya dahil sa sahod. Nag-file ang union ng notice of strike sa DOLE, naghintay nang hindi bababa sa 30 araw habang nagme-mediate ang DOLE, nagsagawa ng secret-ballot na botohan na inaprubahan ng mayorya ng kabuuang membership sa bargaining unit, at ini-report ang resulta hindi bababa sa pitong araw bago ang petsa ng strike. Ito ang mga hakbang na tinatawag ng Phimco na mandatory.
Tinanggal ang mga union officer
Tinanggal ng kompanya ang nahalal na president at mga officer ng union ni Ben ilang sandali matapos mabuo ang union, at nanganganib ang pag-iral ng union. Sinasabi ng talata (c) na hindi ginagamit ang 15-day cooling-off period sa ganitong kaso, at puwedeng kumilos agad ang union.
Hinarangang gate
Sinunod ng isang union ang bawat procedural step, pero hinarangan ng mga nagpi-picket nito ang gate ng kompanya kaya walang makapasok o makalabas. Gaya sa Phimco, puwede pa ring ideklarang ilegal ang strike dahil sa mga paraang ginamit.
Ano ang ibig sabihin nito sa praktika?
- Desisyon ng grupo ang strike na may malaking epekto sa trabaho. Mandatory ang mga hakbang, at kasinghalaga ng proseso ang mga paraang ginamit habang may strike.
- Napupunta sa Labor Arbiters ang mga tanong tungkol sa legality ng strike at lockout sa ilalim ng [Article 224 [217]](/law/labor-code/article-224).
- Ipinapaliwanag sa [Article 259 [248]](/law/labor-code/article-259) ang unfair labor practice, isa sa dalawang ground.
- Puwedeng magreklamo ng illegal dismissal ang mga manggagawang tinanggal kaugnay ng strike. Tingnan ang mga remedyo sa illegal dismissal.
- Tingnan din ang paghahambing na strike vs lockout at ang topic page tungkol sa mga union at strike.
- Puwedeng tumulong ang abogado, ang union federation o ang Public Attorney's Office. Tingnan ang libreng legal na tulong sa Pilipinas.
Ano ang policy at sino ang puwedeng mag-strike?
(a) It is the policy of the State to encourage free trade unionism and free collective bargaining.
(b) Workers shall have the right to engage in concerted activities for purposes of collective bargaining or for their mutual benefit and protection. The right of legitimate labor organizations to strike and picket and of employers to lockout, consistent with the national interest, shall continue to be recognized and respected. However, no labor union may strike and no employer may declare a lockout on grounds involving inter-union and intra-union disputes.
Karapatan ng legitimate labor organization ang strike. Hindi ground para sa strike o lockout ang dispute sa pagitan ng mga union, o sa loob ng isang union.
Anong notice ang dapat ibigay, at kailan?
(c) In cases of bargaining deadlocks, the duly certified or recognized bargaining agent may file a notice of strike or the employer may file a notice of lockout with the Ministry at least 30 days before the intended date thereof. In cases of unfair labor practice, the period of notice shall be 15 days and in the absence of a duly certified or recognized bargaining agent, the notice of strike may be filed by any legitimate labor organization in behalf of its members. However, in case of dismissal from employment of union officers duly elected in accordance with the union constitution and by-laws, which may constitute union busting where the existence of the union is threatened, the 15-day cooling-off period shall not apply and the union may take action immediately.
"Ministry" pa rin ang nakasulat sa article, ang pangalan ng labor department noong isinulat ang talata. Sa simpleng salita:
| Ground | Sino ang nagfa-file | Cooling-off period |
|---|---|---|
| Bargaining deadlock | Ang certified o kinikilalang bargaining agent (o ang employer, para sa lockout) | Hindi bababa sa 30 araw |
| Unfair labor practice | Ang bargaining agent, o anumang legitimate labor organization kung walang bargaining agent | 15 araw |
| Pagtanggal sa mga nahalal na union officer na puwedeng union busting, na nagbabanta sa pag-iral ng union | Ang union | Wala: puwedeng kumilos agad ang union |
Habang cooling-off period, dapat "exert all efforts at mediation and conciliation to effect a voluntary settlement" ang DOLE (talata (e)). Kung hindi pa rin naaayos ang dispute pagkatapos ng panahon, puwedeng mag-strike ang union o magdeklara ng lockout ang employer.
Anong botohan ang kailangan?
(f) A decision to declare a strike must be approved by a majority of the total union membership in the bargaining unit concerned, obtained by secret ballot in meetings or referenda called for that purpose.
Hinihingi ng parehong talata na aprubahan ang lockout ng mayorya ng board of directors o ng mga partner, sa secret ballot din. Balido ang botohan habang tumatagal ang dispute sa halos parehong mga ground. Pagkatapos:
In every case, the union or the employer shall furnish the Ministry the results of the voting at least seven days before the intended strike or lockout, subject to the cooling-off period herein provided.
Hiningi rin ng implementing rules ng 1989 (Book V, Rule XIII, Section 7) na bigyan ng union ang regional branch ng National Conciliation and Mediation Board ng abiso tungkol sa mga meeting para sa botohan hindi bababa sa 24 oras bago nito.
Paano binabasa ng Supreme Court ang mga hakbang na ito?
Sa Phimco Industries v. Phimco Industries Labor Association (2010), sinabi ng Court na para maging balido ang strike, dapat itong sumunod sa article (noon ay Article 263): ang notice 30 araw bago, o 15 araw para sa unfair labor practice; ang strike vote ng mayorya ng kabuuang membership ng union sa secret ballot; at ang pag-report ng resulta sa DOLE hindi bababa sa pitong araw bago. "These requirements are mandatory, and the union's failure to comply renders the strike illegal." Ipinaliwanag nito na binibigyan ng cooling-off period ang mga partido ng pagkakataong magkaayos sa tulong ng conciliator, samantalang "the seven-day strike ban is intended to give the DOLE an opportunity to verify whether the projected strike really carries the imprimatur of the majority of the union members."
Idinagdag ng Court na ang strike na sumunod sa bawat procedural step ay "may still be held illegal where the means employed are illegal," gaya ng kapag pasok ang mga ito sa mga pagbabawal ng Article 264 noon, ngayon ay Article 279. Sa Phimco, sinunod ang proseso, pero idineklarang ilegal ang strike dahil hinarangan ng mga nagpi-picket ang pagpasok at paglabas sa premises.
Ano ang assumption of jurisdiction?
(g) When, in his opinion, there exists a labor dispute causing or likely to cause a strike or lockout in an industry indispensable to the national interest, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may assume jurisdiction over the dispute and decide it or certify the same to the Commission for compulsory arbitration. Such assumption or certification shall have the effect of automatically enjoining the intended or impending strike or lockout as specified in the assumption or certification order. If one has already taken place at the time of assumption or certification, all striking or locked out employees shall immediately return to work and the employer shall immediately resume operations and readmit all workers under the same terms and conditions prevailing before the strike or lockout.
May dagdag na espesyal na patakaran ang talata (g) para sa mga ospital, clinic at katulad na medical institution: dapat iwasan hangga't maaari ang strike at lockout doon, dapat panatilihin ng nag-strike na union o ng nag-lockout na employer ang isang epektibong skeletal workforce ng medical at health personnel, at puwedeng mag-assume ng jurisdiction ang Secretary sa loob ng dalawampu't apat na oras mula nang malaman ang strike o lockout. Pinapanatili ng huling talata ng (g) ang kapangyarihan ng President na tukuyin ang mga industriyang indispensable sa national interest at manghimasok at mag-assume ng jurisdiction sa labor disputes doon. Hindi inililista ng pahinang ito ang mga industriyang iyon.
Ayon sa talata (i), dapat desisyunan ang dispute sa loob ng tatlumpung calendar days mula sa assumption of jurisdiction, certification o submission, at nagiging final and executory ang desisyon sampung calendar days pagkatanggap nito ng mga partido. Bago o sa anumang yugto ng compulsory arbitration, puwedeng piliin ng mga partido ang voluntary arbitration (talata (h)).
Ano ang nangyayari sa mga manggagawang sumali sa strike?
Tinatalakay ito ng Article 279 [264], na kasunod mismo nito. Ganito rin ang sinasabi ng 1989 implementing rules (Book V, Rule XIII, Section 9): "The mere participation of a worker in a lawful strike shall not constitute sufficient ground for termination of his employment even if a replacement had been hired by the employer during such lawful strike." Ang mga union officer na sadyang lumahok sa ilegal na strike, at ang mga manggagawa o officer na sadyang gumawa ng ilegal na gawain habang may strike, ay puwedeng ideklarang nawalan ng employment status.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang requirements para sa balidong strike sa ilalim ng Article 278 [263]?
Sa Phimco Industries v. Phimco Industries Labor Association (2010), inilista ito ng Supreme Court: notice of strike na na-file sa DOLE 30 araw bago ang balak na petsa, o 15 araw para sa unfair labor practice; strike vote na inaprubahan ng mayorya ng kabuuang membership ng union sa bargaining unit sa pamamagitan ng secret ballot; at abiso sa DOLE ng resulta ng botohan hindi bababa sa pitong araw bago ang strike.
Sa anong mga ground puwedeng mag-strike ang union?
Tinutukoy ng Article 278 ang bargaining deadlock at unfair labor practice. Sinasabi rin nito na walang strike o lockout na puwedeng ideklara sa mga ground na tungkol sa inter-union at intra-union disputes.
Puwede bang maging ilegal ang strike kahit sinunod ng union ang mga hakbang?
Oo. Sa Phimco (2010), sinabi ng Court na puwede pa ring ideklarang ilegal ang strike kung ilegal ang mga paraang ginamit, gaya ng mga gawaing ipinagbabawal ng Article 264 noon (ngayon ay Article 279). Sa kasong iyon, hinarangan ng mga nagpi-picket ang pagpasok at paglabas sa premises.
Ano ang assumption of jurisdiction?
Kapag may labor dispute na nagdudulot o malamang na magdulot ng strike o lockout sa industriyang indispensable sa national interest, puwedeng mag-assume ng jurisdiction ang Secretary of Labor and Employment at desisyunan ito, o i-certify ito sa NLRC. Awtomatikong napipigilan ang balak na strike o lockout, at dapat bumalik sa trabaho ang mga nag-strike.
Bakit Article 278 [263] ang tawag dito?
Inilipat ng 2015 renumbering ng Labor Code ang lumang Article 263 sa Article 278. Article 263 ang gamit ng mga desisyon bago ang 2015, kasama ang Phimco.
Pangkalahatang impormasyon lang ito, hindi legal na payo. Para sa kaso mo, magtanong sa abogado, sa Public Attorney's Office (PAO) o sa ahensya.
Nakatulong ba ang page na ito?