Dumiretso sa content

Article 292 [277] ng Labor Code: Notice at hearing bago tanggalin

Ang numero sa bracket, [277], ang dating numero ng article na ito bago ang renumbering ng Labor Code noong 2015.

Status: Inamyendahan

Inamyendahan

Inamyendahan na ang probisyong ito. Ang teksto sa ibaba ang kasalukuyang bersyon.

Ano ang sinasabi ng Article 292 [277]?

Nasa English ang opisyal na teksto ng batas.

(a) All unions are authorized to collect reasonable membership fees, union dues, assessments and fines and other contributions for labor education and research, mutual death and hospitalization benefits, welfare fund, strike fund and credit and cooperative undertakings.

(b) Subject to the constitutional right of workers to security of tenure and their right to be protected against dismissal except for a just and authorized cause and without prejudice to the requirement of notice under Article 283 of this Code, the employer shall furnish the worker whose employment is sought to be terminated a written notice containing a statement of the causes for termination and shall afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires in accordance with company rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to guidelines set by the Department of Labor and Employment. Any decision taken by the employer shall be without prejudice to the right of the worker to contest the validity or legality of his dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission. The burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause shall rest on the employer. The Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment may suspend the effects of the termination pending resolution of the dispute in the event of a prima facie finding by the appropriate official of the Department of Labor and Employment before whom such dispute is pending that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.

(c) Any employee, whether employed for a definite period or not, shall, beginning on his first day of service, be considered as an employee for purposes of membership in any labor union.

(d) No docket fee shall be assessed in labor standards disputes. In all other disputes, docket fees may be assessed against the filing party, provided that in bargaining deadlock, such fees shall be shared equally by the negotiating parties.

(e) The Minister of Labor and Employment and the Minister of the Budget shall cause to be created or reclassified in accordance with law such positions as may be necessary to carry out the objectives of this Code and cause the upgrading of the salaries of the personnel involved in the Labor Relations System of the Ministry. Funds needed for this purpose shall be provided out of the Special Activities Fund appropriated by Batas Pambansa Blg. 80 and from annual appropriations thereafter.

(f) A special Voluntary Arbitration Fund is hereby established in the Board to subsidize the cost of voluntary arbitration in cases involving the interpretation and implementation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, including the Arbitrator’s fees, and for such other related purposes to promote and develop voluntary arbitration. The Board shall administer the Special Voluntary Arbitration Fund in accordance with the guidelines it may adopt upon the recommendation of the Council, which guidelines shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of Labor and Employment. Continuing funds needed for this purpose in the initial yearly amount of fifteen million pesos (P15,000,000.00) shall be provided in the 1989 annual general appropriations acts.

The amount of subsidy in appropriate cases shall be determined by the Board in accordance with established guidelines issued by it upon the recommendation of the Council.

The Fund shall also be utilized for the operation of the Council, the training and education of Voluntary Arbitrators, and the promotion and development of a comprehensive Voluntary Arbitration Program.

(g) The Ministry shall help promote and gradually develop, with the agreement of labor organizations and employers, labor-management cooperation programs at appropriate levels of the enterprise based on shared responsibility and mutual respect in order to ensure industrial peace and improvement in productivity, working conditions and the quality of working life.

(h) In establishments where no legitimate labor organization exists, labor-management committees may be formed voluntarily by workers and employers for the purpose of promoting industrial peace. The Department of Labor and Employment shall endeavor to enlighten and educate the workers and employers on their rights and responsibilities through labor education with emphasis on the policy thrusts of this Code.

(i) To ensure speedy labor justice, the periods provided in this Code within which decisions or resolutions of labor relations cases or matters should be rendered shall be mandatory. For this purpose, a case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading or memorandum required by the rules of the Commission or by the Commission itself, or the Labor Arbiter, or the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations or Med-Arbiter, or the Regional Director.

Upon expiration of the corresponding period, a certification stating why a decision or resolution has not been rendered within the said period shall be issued forthwith by the Chairman of the Commission, the Executive Labor Arbiter, or the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations or Med-Arbiter, or the Regional Director, as the case may be, and a copy thereof served upon the parties.

Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the aforesaid officials shall, without prejudice to any liability which may have been incurred as a consequence thereof, see to it that the case or matter shall be decided or resolved without any further delay.

Basahin ang Labor Code sa website ng DOLE (luma pa ang article numbers doon, bago ang 2015)

Ano ang ibig sabihin nito sa simpleng salita?

Ang Article 292 [277] (ang [277] ay ang numero nito bago ang 2015 renumbering) ay koleksyon ng iba't ibang probisyon. Ang pinakakilalang bahagi nito ay ang paragraph (b): bago tapusin ng employer ang trabaho ng isang tao, dapat niyang bigyan ang manggagawa ng nakasulat na notice ng mga dahilan at patas na pagkakataong mapakinggan at ipagtanggol ang sarili. Nasa employer ang burden na patunayang may valid o authorized cause ang dismissal, at laging puwedeng kuwestiyunin ito ng manggagawa sa National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

Paragraph (b) lang ang ipinapaliwanag ng pahinang ito. Tungkol sa ibang bagay ang ibang talata ng Article 292, gaya ng union fees at ang pagpapatakbo ng mga labor relations office, at hindi ipinapaliwanag dito.

Ganito ang paragraph (b):

Subject to the constitutional right of workers to security of tenure and their right to be protected against dismissal except for a just and authorized cause and without prejudice to the requirement of notice under Article 283 of this Code, the employer shall furnish the worker whose employment is sought to be terminated a written notice containing a statement of the causes for termination and shall afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires in accordance with company rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to guidelines set by the Department of Labor and Employment.

Article 292 [277], Labor Code

Ang "Article 283" sa teksto ay ang lumang numero ng article tungkol sa closure at reduction of personnel, na ngayon ay [Article 298 [283]](/law/labor-code/article-298). Hindi binago ang numero ng mga cross-reference sa loob ng Code noong 2015.

Paano ito gumagana sa totoong buhay?

Lito: tamang notice at hearing

Inakusahan si Lito, isang warehouse checker, na nameke ng mga delivery receipt. Binigyan siya ng employer ng nakasulat na notice na nagsasabi ng kaso at ng mga facts, at inimbitahan siyang magpaliwanag nang nakasulat at sa isang meeting kung saan nagdala siya ng union officer. Pagkatapos siyang pakinggan, nagpadala ang employer ng ikalawang notice na may desisyon nito. Sinusunod ng mga hakbang na ito ang paragraph (b) at ang two-notice rule.

Cora: tinanggal sa text message

Nakatanggap si Cora, isang sales clerk, ng text mula sa manager niya na nagsasabing tanggal na siya dahil bastos daw siya sa isang customer. Walang nakasulat na notice ng kaso at walang pagkakataong magpaliwanag. Kahit mapatunayan pa ng employer ang just cause, puwedeng humantong sa nominal damages ang kawalan ng notice at hearing, gaya ng sa Agabon. Kung hindi nito mapatunayan ang dahilan, ilegal ang dismissal.

Ano ang ibig sabihin nito sa praktika?

  • Dapat nakasulat ang notice at dapat nitong sabihin ang mga dahilan ng termination.
  • Ang ibig sabihin ng "ample opportunity to be heard" ay tunay na pagkakataong sagutin ang kaso, kasama ang isang representative kung gusto ng manggagawa.
  • Ang employer, hindi ang manggagawa, ang dapat magpatunay ng dahilan sa NLRC.
  • Hindi kailanman huling salita ang desisyon ng kompanya: puwedeng mag-file ang manggagawa ng complaint sa regional branch ng NLRC. Dumadaan muna ang karamihan ng kaso sa conciliation sa DOLE: tingnan ang paano mag-file ng labor complaint.
  • Para sa mga dismissal na walang anumang notice, tingnan ang tinanggal nang walang notice?.

Ano ang hinihingi ng paragraph (b) sa madaling salita?

Bago tapusin ang trabaho ng isang manggagawa, dapat ang employer ay:

  1. magbigay sa manggagawa ng nakasulat na notice na nagsasabi ng mga dahilan ng termination; at
  2. magbigay sa manggagawa ng sapat na pagkakataong mapakinggan at ipagtanggol ang sarili, kasama ang isang representative kung gusto ng manggagawa.

Ginagawa ito ayon sa company rules na sumusunod sa DOLE guidelines. Para sa mga authorized cause gaya ng retrenchment o closure, may hiwalay ding patakaran sa notice ang Article 298 [283]: nakasulat na notice sa mga manggagawa at sa DOLE, hindi bababa sa isang buwan bago.

Sino ang dapat magpatunay ng dahilan ng dismissal?

Ang employer. Tuloy ng talata:

The burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause shall rest on the employer.

Article 292 [277], Labor Code

Kaya hindi kailangang patunayan ng manggagawa na wala siyang ginawang mali. Kung hindi mapatunayan ng employer ang just cause sa ilalim ng [Article 297 [282]](/law/labor-code/article-297) o ang authorized cause, hindi valid ang dismissal, at puwedeng humingi ang manggagawa ng reinstatement at backwages sa ilalim ng [Article 294 [279]](/law/labor-code/article-294).

Puwede bang kuwestiyunin ng manggagawa ang desisyon ng employer?

Oo. Sinasabi ng talata na anumang desisyon ng employer ay "without prejudice to the right of the worker to contest the validity or legality of his dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission." Hindi naaalis ng imbestigasyon ng kompanya ang karapatang iyon.

Ano ang two-notice rule?

Binabasa ng Supreme Court ang patakaran sa notice at hearing bilang two-notice rule para sa mga dismissal na batay sa just cause. Sa Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (2019), sinabi ng Court: "The employer must comply with the two (2)-notice requirement, while the employee must be given an opportunity to be heard." Ayon sa paglalarawan ng Court sa proseso sa Agabon v. NLRC (2004), sinasabi ng unang notice ang mga ground kung bakit gustong magtanggal, at sinasabi ng ikalawang notice ang desisyong magtanggal pagkatapos mapakinggan ang manggagawa.

Ano ang mangyayari kung nilaktawan ng employer ang notice at hearing?

Kung totoo ang dahilan ng dismissal pero hindi sinunod ang proseso, puwedeng manatili ang dismissal, pero magbabayad ang employer ng nominal damages. Sa Agabon v. NLRC (2004), itinakda ito ng Supreme Court sa ₱30,000 para sa kasong iyon at sinabing nakadepende ang halaga sa facts. Kung walang valid na dahilan, hindi lang proseso ang problema: ilegal ang dismissal.

Kailan puwedeng i-suspend ng DOLE ang dismissal?

Nagbibigay ang huling pangungusap ng paragraph (b) ng espesyal na kapangyarihan sa Secretary of Labor and Employment:

The Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment may suspend the effects of the termination pending resolution of the dispute in the event of a prima facie finding by the appropriate official of the Department of Labor and Employment before whom such dispute is pending that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.

Article 292 [277], Labor Code

Sa dalawang sitwasyon lang ito puwede: kapag puwedeng magdulot ang termination ng seryosong labor dispute, o kapag bahagi ito ng mass lay-off.

Bakit "Article 292 [277]"?

Binago ang numero ng mga article ng Labor Code noong 2015 sa pamamagitan ng DOLE Department Advisory No. 01, series of 2015, kasunod ng Republic Act No. 10151. Binabanggit ng mga bagong desisyon ng Supreme Court ang article bilang "Article 292 [277]": halimbawa, G & S Transport Corporation v. Medina (2022), Bance v. University of St. Anthony (2021) at Ador v. T. Osada Logistics and Services (2026).

Anong mga desisyon ng Supreme Court ang kaugnay?

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang hinihingi ng Article 292(b) [277(b)] ng Labor Code bago magtanggal?

Dapat bigyan ng employer ang manggagawa ng nakasulat na notice na nagsasabi ng mga dahilan ng termination, at bigyan siya ng sapat na pagkakataong mapakinggan at ipagtanggol ang sarili, kasama ang isang representative kung gusto ng manggagawa.

Sino ang dapat magpatunay na valid ang dismissal?

Ang employer. Ayon sa Article 292(b), nasa employer ang burden na patunayang may valid o authorized cause ang termination.

Puwede pa bang pumunta sa NLRC ang tinanggal na manggagawa pagkatapos magdesisyon ng kompanya?

Oo. Ayon sa Article 292(b), anumang desisyon ng employer ay without prejudice sa karapatan ng manggagawa na kuwestiyunin ang dismissal sa pamamagitan ng pag-file ng complaint sa regional branch ng National Labor Relations Commission.

Ano ang two-notice rule?

Hinihingi ng Supreme Court na magbigay ang employer ng dalawang notice at pagkakataong mapakinggan bago magtanggal dahil sa just cause. Sa Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (2019), sinabi ng Court na dapat sundin ng employer ang two-notice requirement, habang dapat bigyan ang empleyado ng pagkakataong mapakinggan.

Puwede bang pahintuin ng DOLE ang dismissal habang tuloy ang kaso?

Pinapayagan ng Article 292(b) ang Secretary of Labor and Employment na i-suspend ang epekto ng termination habang may dispute, kung makita ng isang opisyal ng Department, prima facie, na puwedeng magdulot ang termination ng seryosong labor dispute o bahagi ito ng mass lay-off.

Pangkalahatang impormasyon lang ito, hindi legal na payo. Para sa kaso mo, magtanong sa abogado, sa Public Attorney's Office (PAO) o sa ahensya.

I-share ang page na ito

MessengerViberWhatsApp

Nakatulong ba ang page na ito?

I-report ang luma o maling impormasyon

Huwag isama ang personal na detalye gaya ng pangalan, ID number o password.