Diretso iti content

Article 278 [263] ti Labor Code: Strike, picketing ken lockout

Ti numero iti bracket, [263], isu ti dati a numero daytoy nga article sakbay ti renumbering ti Labor Code idi 2015.

Status: Naamyendaan

Naamyendaan

Naamyendaan daytoy a probision. Ti testo iti baba ti agdama a bersion.

Ania ti kuna ti Article 278 [263]?

Ti opisial a testo ti linteg ket iti English.

(a) It is the policy of the State to encourage free trade unionism and free collective bargaining.

(b) Workers shall have the right to engage in concerted activities for purposes of collective bargaining or for their mutual benefit and protection. The right of legitimate labor organizations to strike and picket and of employers to lockout, consistent with the national interest, shall continue to be recognized and respected. However, no labor union may strike and no employer may declare a lockout on grounds involving inter-union and intra-union disputes.

(c) In cases of bargaining deadlocks, the duly certified or recognized bargaining agent may file a notice of strike or the employer may file a notice of lockout with the Ministry at least 30 days before the intended date thereof. In cases of unfair labor practice, the period of notice shall be 15 days and in the absence of a duly certified or recognized bargaining agent, the notice of strike may be filed by any legitimate labor organization in behalf of its members. However, in case of dismissal from employment of union officers duly elected in accordance with the union constitution and by-laws, which may constitute union busting where the existence of the union is threatened, the 15-day cooling-off period shall not apply and the union may take action immediately.

(d) The notice must be in accordance with such implementing rules and regulations as the Minister of Labor and Employment may promulgate.

(e) During the cooling-off period, it shall be the duty of the Ministry to exert all efforts at mediation and conciliation to effect a voluntary settlement. Should the dispute remain unsettled until the lapse of the requisite number of days from the mandatory filing of the notice, the labor union may strike or the employer may declare a lockout.

(f) A decision to declare a strike must be approved by a majority of the total union membership in the bargaining unit concerned, obtained by secret ballot in meetings or referenda called for that purpose. A decision to declare a lockout must be approved by a majority of the board of directors of the corporation or association or of the partners in a partnership, obtained by secret ballot in a meeting called for that purpose. The decision shall be valid for the duration of the dispute based on substantially the same grounds considered when the strike or lockout vote was taken. The Ministry may, at its own initiative or upon the request of any affected party, supervise the conduct of the secret balloting. In every case, the union or the employer shall furnish the Ministry the results of the voting at least seven days before the intended strike or lockout, subject to the cooling-off period herein provided.

(g) When, in his opinion, there exists a labor dispute causing or likely to cause a strike or lockout in an industry indispensable to the national interest, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may assume jurisdiction over the dispute and decide it or certify the same to the Commission for compulsory arbitration. Such assumption or certification shall have the effect of automatically enjoining the intended or impending strike or lockout as specified in the assumption or certification order. If one has already taken place at the time of assumption or certification, all striking or locked out employees shall immediately return to work and the employer shall immediately resume operations and readmit all workers under the same terms and conditions prevailing before the strike or lockout. The Secretary of Labor and Employment or the Commission may seek the assistance of law enforcement agencies to ensure compliance with this provision as well as with such orders as he may issue to enforce the same.

In line with the national concern for and the highest respect accorded to the right of patients to life and health, strikes and lockouts in hospitals, clinics and similar medical institutions shall, to every extent possible, be avoided, and all serious efforts, not only by labor and management but government as well, be exhausted to substantially minimize, if not prevent, their adverse effects on such life and health, through the exercise, however legitimate, by labor of its right to strike and by management to lockout. In labor disputes adversely affecting the continued operation of such hospitals, clinics or medical institutions, it shall be the duty of the striking union or locking-out employer to provide and maintain an effective skeletal workforce of medical and other health personnel, whose movement and services shall be unhampered and unrestricted, as are necessary to insure the proper and adequate protection of the life and health of its patients, most especially emergency cases, for the duration of the strike or lockout. In such cases, therefore, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may immediately assume, within twenty four (24) hours from knowledge of the occurrence of such a strike or lockout, jurisdiction over the same or certify it to the Commission for compulsory arbitration. For this purpose, the contending parties are strictly enjoined to comply with such orders, prohibitions and/or injunctions as are issued by the Secretary of Labor and Employment or the Commission, under pain of immediate disciplinary action, including dismissal or loss of employment status or payment by the locking-out employer of backwages, damages and other affirmative relief, even criminal prosecution against either or both of them.

The foregoing notwithstanding, the President of the Philippines shall not be precluded from determining the industries that, in his opinion, are indispensable to the national interest, and from intervening at any time and assuming jurisdiction over any such labor dispute in order to settle or terminate the same.

(h) Before or at any stage of the compulsory arbitration process, the parties may opt to submit their dispute to voluntary arbitration.

(i) The Secretary of Labor and Employment, the Commission or the voluntary arbitrator or panel of voluntary arbitrators shall decide or resolve the dispute within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the assumption of jurisdiction or the certification or submission of the dispute, as the case may be. The decision of the President, the Secretary of Labor and Employment, the Commission or the voluntary arbitrator shall be final and executory ten (10) calendar days after receipt thereof by the parties.

Basaen ti Labor Code iti website ti DOLE (daan pay ti article numbers sadiay, sakbay ti 2015)

Ania ti kayatna a sawen iti nalaka a sasao?

Ikeddeng ti Article 278 [263] ti Labor Code dagiti pagalagadan para iti strike, picketing ken lockout. Maipalubos ti strike wenno lockout gapu iti bargaining deadlock wenno unfair labor practice, kalpasan ti notice iti DOLE, cooling-off period a 30 wenno 15 nga aldaw, botos babaen ti secret ballot, ken report ti botos iti saan a kumurang ngem pito nga aldaw sakbay. Kadagiti industria a kasapulan unay ti national interest, mabalin nga alaen ti Secretary of Labor and Employment ti jurisdiction ket isardengna ti strike.

Article 263 daytoy nga artikulo sakbay ti 2015 a renumbering ti Labor Code. Naggapu dagiti paragrapona iti Batas Pambansa Blg. 130 (1981), Executive Order No. 111 (1986) ken Republic Act No. 6715 (1989). Saan nga iladawan daytoy a panid dagiti agdama a rules of procedure ti National Conciliation and Mediation Board.

Kasano nga agandar daytoy iti pudno a biag?

Ti bargaining deadlock

Nagsardeng ti saritaan iti nagbaetan ti union ni Rosa ken ti kompania gapu iti sueldo. Nangipila ti union iti notice of strike iti DOLE, nagur-uray iti saan a kumurang ngem 30 nga aldaw bayat ti mediation ti DOLE, nangangay iti botos babaen ti secret ballot nga inaprobaran ti mayoria ti dagup a kameng iti bargaining unit, ket inreportna ti resulta iti saan a kumurang ngem pito nga aldaw sakbay ti petsa ti strike. Dagitoy dagiti addang nga awagan ti Phimco a mandatory.

Na-dismiss dagiti opisial ti union

Dinismiss ti kompania ti napili a presidente ken dagiti opisial ti union ni Ben kalpasan laeng a nabukel ti union, ket nabutbutengan ti kaadda ti union. Kuna ti paragrapo (c) a saan nga agaplikar ti 15-day cooling-off period iti kasta a kaso, ket mabalin nga agtignay a dagus ti union.

Nalapdan a gate

Sinurot ti maysa a union ti tunggal addang ti proseso, ngem linapdan dagiti picketer-na ti gate ti kompania isu nga awan ti makastrek wenno makaruar. Kas iti Phimco, mabalin latta a maikeddeng nga illegal ti strike gapu kadagiti wagas a naaramat.

Ania ti kayatna a sawen iti praktika?

  • Ti strike ket desision ti grupo nga addaan nadagsen nga epekto kadagiti trabaho. Mandatory dagiti addang, ket kas kapateg ti proseso dagiti wagas a maaramat bayat ti strike.
  • Dagiti saludsod maipapan iti kinalegal dagiti strike ken lockout ket mapan kadagiti Labor Arbiter iti sidong ti [Article 224 [217]](/law/labor-code/article-224).
  • Ti unfair labor practice, maysa kadagiti dua a ground, ket nailawlawag iti [Article 259 [248]](/law/labor-code/article-259).
  • Dagiti trabahador a na-dismiss a nainaig iti strike ket mabalin nga agreklamo iti illegal dismissal. Kitaem ti illegal dismissal remedies.
  • Kitaem met ti panangidilig a strike vs lockout ken ti topic page maipapan iti unions and strikes.
  • Mabalin a tumulong ti abogado, union federation wenno ti Public Attorney's Office. Kitaem ti Libre a legal a tulong iti Pilipinas.

Ania ti polisia ken siasino ti mabalin nga ag-strike?

(a) It is the policy of the State to encourage free trade unionism and free collective bargaining.

(b) Workers shall have the right to engage in concerted activities for purposes of collective bargaining or for their mutual benefit and protection. The right of legitimate labor organizations to strike and picket and of employers to lockout, consistent with the national interest, shall continue to be recognized and respected. However, no labor union may strike and no employer may declare a lockout on grounds involving inter-union and intra-union disputes.

Article 278 [263], Labor Code

Ti strike ket karbengan ti lehitimo a labor organization. Dagiti dispute iti nagbaetan dagiti union, wenno iti uneg ti maysa a union, ket saan a ground para iti strike wenno lockout.

Ania a notice ti masapul nga ited, ken kaano?

(c) In cases of bargaining deadlocks, the duly certified or recognized bargaining agent may file a notice of strike or the employer may file a notice of lockout with the Ministry at least 30 days before the intended date thereof. In cases of unfair labor practice, the period of notice shall be 15 days and in the absence of a duly certified or recognized bargaining agent, the notice of strike may be filed by any legitimate labor organization in behalf of its members. However, in case of dismissal from employment of union officers duly elected in accordance with the union constitution and by-laws, which may constitute union busting where the existence of the union is threatened, the 15-day cooling-off period shall not apply and the union may take action immediately.

Article 278 [263], Labor Code

Usaren pay laeng ti artikulo ti sao a "Ministry," ti nagan ti departamento ti labor idi naisurat ti paragrapo. Iti nalaka a sasao:

Ania a notice ti masapul nga ited, ken kaano?
GroundSiasino ti agipilaCooling-off period
Bargaining deadlockTi certified wenno mabigbig a bargaining agent (wenno ti employer, para iti lockout)Saan a kumurang ngem 30 nga aldaw
Unfair labor practiceTi bargaining agent, wenno aniaman a lehitimo a labor organization no awan15 nga aldaw
Dismissal dagiti napili nga opisial ti union a mabalin a union busting, a mangbutbuteng iti kaadda ti unionTi unionAwan: mabalin nga agtignay a dagus ti union

Bayat ti cooling-off period, masapul nga "exert all efforts at mediation and conciliation to effect a voluntary settlement" ti DOLE (paragrapo (e)). No saan pay a narisut ti dispute iti panagpatingga ti period, mabalin nga ag-strike ti union wenno mangideklara iti lockout ti employer.

Ania a botos ti kasapulan?

(f) A decision to declare a strike must be approved by a majority of the total union membership in the bargaining unit concerned, obtained by secret ballot in meetings or referenda called for that purpose.

Article 278 [263], Labor Code

Kiddawen met ti isu met laeng a paragrapo a ti lockout ket masapul nga aprobaran ti mayoria ti board of directors wenno dagiti partner, babaen met ti secret ballot. Agtalinaed nga umiso ti botos iti intero a kabayag ti dispute kadagiti isu met laeng a ground. Kalpasanna:

In every case, the union or the employer shall furnish the Ministry the results of the voting at least seven days before the intended strike or lockout, subject to the cooling-off period herein provided.

Article 278 [263], Labor Code

Kiniddaw met ti implementing rules ti 1989 (Book V, Rule XIII, Section 7) nga ikkan ti union ti regional branch ti National Conciliation and Mediation Board iti pakaammo maipapan kadagiti gimong ti panagbotos iti saan a kumurang ngem 24 nga oras sakbay.

Kasano a basaen ti Supreme Court dagitoy nga addang?

Iti Phimco Industries v. Phimco Industries Labor Association (2010), kinuna ti Korte a tapno umiso ti strike, masapul a tungpalenna ti artikulo (idi Article 263): ti notice 30 nga aldaw sakbay, wenno 15 nga aldaw para iti unfair labor practice; ti strike vote ti mayoria ti dagup a kameng ti union babaen ti secret ballot; ken ti report ti botos iti DOLE iti saan a kumurang ngem pito nga aldaw sakbay. "These requirements are mandatory, and the union's failure to comply renders the strike illegal." Inlawlawagna a ti cooling-off period ket mangted kadagiti partido iti gundaway nga agtunos babaen ti tulong ti conciliator, idinto a "the seven-day strike ban is intended to give the DOLE an opportunity to verify whether the projected strike really carries the imprimatur of the majority of the union members."

Innayon ti Korte a ti strike a nangtungpal iti tunggal addang ti proseso ket "may still be held illegal where the means employed are illegal," kas no masakupan dagitoy dagiti pammarit ti Article 264 iti dayta a tiempo, ita Article 279. Iti Phimco, nasurot ti proseso, ngem naikeddeng nga illegal ti strike gapu ta linapdan dagiti picketer ti iseserrek ken ruruar iti lugar.

Ania ti assumption of jurisdiction?

(g) When, in his opinion, there exists a labor dispute causing or likely to cause a strike or lockout in an industry indispensable to the national interest, the Secretary of Labor and Employment may assume jurisdiction over the dispute and decide it or certify the same to the Commission for compulsory arbitration. Such assumption or certification shall have the effect of automatically enjoining the intended or impending strike or lockout as specified in the assumption or certification order. If one has already taken place at the time of assumption or certification, all striking or locked out employees shall immediately return to work and the employer shall immediately resume operations and readmit all workers under the same terms and conditions prevailing before the strike or lockout.

Article 278 [263], Labor Code

Mangnayon ti paragrapo (g) kadagiti espesial a pagalagadan para kadagiti ospital, klinika ken kapada a medical institution: kadagitoy, masapul a liklikan dagiti strike ken lockout iti kabaelan, masapul a mangtaginayon ti union nga ag-strike wenno ti employer nga ag-lockout iti epektibo a skeletal workforce dagiti medical ken health personnel, ket mabalin nga alaen ti Secretary ti jurisdiction iti uneg ti duapulo ket uppat nga oras manipud iti pannakaammona iti strike wenno lockout. Ti naudi a paragrapo ti (g) ket mangtalinaed iti pannakabalin ti Presidente a mangikeddeng kadagiti industria a kasapulan unay ti national interest ken makibiang ken mangala iti jurisdiction kadagiti labor dispute kadagitoy. Saan nga ilista daytoy a panid dagita nga industria.

Iti sidong ti paragrapo (i), masapul a maikeddeng ti dispute iti uneg ti tallopulo a calendar days manipud iti assumption of jurisdiction, certification wenno submission, ket ti desision ket agbalin a final and executory sangapulo a calendar days kalpasan a maawat dagiti partido. Sakbay wenno iti aniaman nga addang ti compulsory arbitration, mabalin a pilien dagiti partido ti voluntary arbitration (paragrapo (h)).

Ania ti mapasamak kadagiti trabahador a makiraman iti strike?

Sakupen daytoy ti Article 279 [264], nga adda a dagus kalpasanna. Isu met laeng ti kuna ti 1989 implementing rules (Book V, Rule XIII, Section 9): "The mere participation of a worker in a lawful strike shall not constitute sufficient ground for termination of his employment even if a replacement had been hired by the employer during such lawful strike." Dagiti opisial ti union a siaammo a nakiraman iti illegal a strike, ken dagiti trabahador wenno opisial a siaammo a nangaramid iti illegal nga aramid bayat ti strike, ket mabalin a maideklara a napukawda ti employment status-da.

Kadawyan a saludsod

Ania dagiti requirements para iti umiso a strike iti sidong ti Article 278 [263]?

Iti Phimco Industries v. Phimco Industries Labor Association (2010), inlista dagitoy ti Supreme Court: notice of strike a naipila iti DOLE 30 nga aldaw sakbay ti panggep a petsa, wenno 15 nga aldaw para iti unfair labor practice; strike vote nga inaprobaran ti mayoria ti dagup a kameng ti union iti bargaining unit babaen ti secret ballot; ken pakaammo iti DOLE maipapan iti resulta ti botos iti saan a kumurang ngem pito nga aldaw sakbay ti strike.

Ania dagiti ground a mabalin a pagbatayan ti union nga ag-strike?

Dakamaten ti Article 278 dagiti bargaining deadlock ken unfair labor practice. Kunana met nga awan ti strike wenno lockout a mabalin nga ideklara gapu kadagiti inter-union ken intra-union dispute.

Mabalin kadi nga illegal ti strike uray no sinurot ti union dagiti addang?

Wen. Iti Phimco (2010), kinuna ti Korte a ti strike ket mabalin latta a maikeddeng nga illegal no illegal dagiti wagas a naaramat, kas kadagiti aramid a maiparit iti Article 264 iti dayta a tiempo (ita Article 279). Iti dayta a kaso, linapdan dagiti picketer ti iseserrek ken ruruar iti lugar.

Ania ti assumption of jurisdiction?

No ti labor dispute ket mangpataud wenno mabalin a mangpataud iti strike wenno lockout iti industria a kasapulan unay ti national interest, mabalin nga alaen ti Secretary of Labor and Employment ti jurisdiction ket ikeddengna, wenno i-certify iti NLRC. Kalpasanna, automatiko a malapdan ti panggep a strike wenno lockout, ket masapul nga agsubli dagiti nag-strike iti trabaho.

Apay nga Article 278 [263] ti awagna?

Iti 2015 a renumbering ti Labor Code, ti daan nga Article 263 ket nagbalin nga Article 278. Dagiti desision sakbay ti 2015, a pakairamanan ti Phimco, ket Article 263 ti usarenda.

Pangkabaruan laeng nga impormasion daytoy, saan a legal a pammagbaga. Para iti kasoyo, agsaludsod iti abogado, iti Public Attorney's Office (PAO) wenno iti ahensia.

I-share daytoy a page

MessengerViberWhatsApp

Nakatulong kadi daytoy a page?

I-report ti daan wenno biddut nga impormasion

Dimo iraman ti personal a detalye kas iti nagan, ID number wenno password.