Article 224 [217] ti Labor Code: Jurisdiction dagiti Labor Arbiter ken ti Commission
Ti numero iti bracket, [217], isu ti dati a numero daytoy nga article sakbay ti renumbering ti Labor Code idi 2015.
Status: Naamyendaan
Naamyendaan
Naamyendaan daytoy a probision. Ti testo iti baba ti agdama a bersion.
- Inamyendaan ti: Republic Act No. 6715
Ania ti kuna ti Article 224 [217]?
Ti opisial a testo ti linteg ket iti English.
(a) Except as otherwise provided under this Code, the Labor Arbiters shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide, within thirty (30) calendar days after the submission of the case by the parties for decision without extension, even in the absence of stenographic notes, the following cases involving all workers, whether agricultural or non-agricultural:
(1) Unfair labor practice cases;
(2) Termination disputes;
(3) If accompanied with a claim for reinstatement, those cases that workers may file involving wages, rates of pay, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment;
(4) Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages arising from the employer-employee relations;
(5) Cases arising from any violation of Article 264 of this Code, including questions involving the legality of strikes and lockouts; and
(6) Except claims for Employees Compensation, Social Security, Medicare and maternity benefits, all other claims arising from employer-employee relations, including those of persons in domestic or household service, involving an amount exceeding five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) regardless of whether accompanied with a claim for reinstatement.
(b) The Commission shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases decided by Labor Arbiters.
(c) Cases arising from the interpretation or implementation of collective bargaining agreements and those arising from the interpretation or enforcement of company personnel policies shall be disposed of by the Labor Arbiter by referring the same to the grievance machinery and voluntary arbitration as may be provided in said agreements.
Basaen ti Labor Code iti website ti DOLE (daan pay ti article numbers sadiay, sakbay ti 2015)
Ania ti kayatna a sawen iti nalaka a sasao?
Ilista ti Article 224 [217] ti Labor Code dagiti kaso a denggen ken ikeddeng dagiti Labor Arbiter ti National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC): unfair labor practices, dismissal, money claims a nasurok ngem ₱5,000, damages a naggapu iti relasion ti panagtrabaho ken kaso ti strike, a pakairamanan ti sabali pay. Pagbalinenna met ti NLRC a pagapelaran ti tunggal desision ti Labor Arbiter. Dagiti bassit a money claim nga awan ti reinstatement, ken dagiti labor standards inspection, ket sumurot kadagiti sabali nga artikulo.
Article 217 daytoy nga artikulo sakbay ti 2015 a renumbering ti Labor Code. Dinakamat ti Supreme Court ti panagbaliw iti Del Monte Land Transport Bus Co. v. Armenta (2021). Naggapu ti testona iti Section 9 ti Republic Act No. 6715 (1989).
Kasano nga agandar daytoy iti pudno a biag?
Rina: na-dismiss ket kayatna a maisubli ti trabahona
Na-dismiss ni Rina nga awan ti pakaammo ket kayatna ti reinstatement ken backwages. Ti kasona ket termination dispute iti sidong ti item (2). No saan nga agballigi ti conciliation, mapan daytoy iti Labor Arbiter.
Marco: bassit a wage claim
Nag-resign ni Marco ket agsingsingir iti ₱3,500 a saan a nabayadan a sueldo, nga awan ti reinstatement. Iti sidong ti Article 129, mabalin nga ikeddeng ti DOLE Regional Director ti claim-na. No nasurok ngem ₱5,000 ti claim-na, masakupan daytoy ti item (6) ket mapan iti Labor Arbiter.
Elena: saludsod maipapan iti CBA
Saan nga agtunos ti union ni Elena ken ti kompania no kasano a basaen ti maysa a clause ti collective bargaining agreement-da maipapan iti rice allowance. Iti sidong ti paragrapo (c), iyawat ti Labor Arbiter daytoy a kita ti dispute iti grievance machinery ken voluntary arbitration.
Ania ti kayatna a sawen iti praktika?
- Addaan deadline dagiti money claim. Kitaem ti labor money claims prescription.
- Para kadagiti remedio kadagiti kaso ti dismissal, kitaem ti illegal dismissal remedies ken [Article 294 [279]](/law/labor-code/article-294).
- Para kadagiti appeal, kitaem ti kasano ti agapela iti desision ti Labor Arbiter.
- Kitaem met ti panangidilig a Labor Arbiter vs DOLE Regional Director.
- No ania nga opisina ti addaan jurisdiction ket agdepende kadagiti pasamak ti tunggal kaso. Mabalin a tumulong ti abogado, union wenno ti Public Attorney's Office. Kitaem ti Libre a legal a tulong iti Pilipinas.
Ania dagiti kaso a mapan iti Labor Arbiter?
Ited ti paragrapo (a) ti listaan:
(a) Except as otherwise provided under this Code, the Labor Arbiters shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide, within thirty (30) calendar days after the submission of the case by the parties for decision without extension, even in the absence of stenographic notes, the following cases involving all workers, whether agricultural or non-agricultural:
(1) Unfair labor practice cases;
(2) Termination disputes;
(3) If accompanied with a claim for reinstatement, those cases that workers may file involving wages, rates of pay, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment;
(4) Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages arising from the employer-employee relations;
(5) Cases arising from any violation of Article 264 of this Code, including questions involving the legality of strikes and lockouts; and
(6) Except claims for Employees Compensation, Social Security, Medicare and maternity benefits, all other claims arising from employer-employee relations, including those of persons in domestic or household service, involving an amount exceeding five thousand pesos (P5,000.00)
Agpatingga ti item (6) kadagiti sasao a "regardless of whether accompanied with a claim for reinstatement," kas dinakamat ti Supreme Court iti Milan v. NLRC (2015) ken iti Del Monte Land Transport (2021).
Ti "Article 264" iti item (5) ket ti daan a numero ti artikulo maipapan kadagiti maiparit nga aktibidad bayat ti strike, ita Article 279. Ti teksto ti artikulo, kas naidulin iti renumbered edition, ket usarenna pay laeng ti daan a numero iti daytoy a cross-reference.
Ania ti kaipapanan dagiti innem nga item iti nalaka a sasao?
| Item | Kita ti kaso | Inaramid a pagarigan |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | Unfair labor practice | Panang-dismiss kadagiti union organizer |
| (2) | Termination disputes | Claim ti illegal dismissal |
| (3) | Sueldo ken kasasaad ti trabaho, no kadua ti reinstatement | Saan a nabayadan nga overtime a kadua ti panagkiddaw a maisubli ti trabaho |
| (4) | Damages a naggapu iti relasion ti panagtrabaho | Moral damages para iti dismissal a naaramid iti bad faith |
| (5) | Strike ken lockout | No legal ti strike |
| (6) | Sabali a money claim a nasurok ngem ₱5,000 | Saan a nabayadan a sueldo ken benepisio ti trabahador a pimmanaw |
Saan a sakupen ti item (6) dagiti claim para iti employees' compensation, social security, Medicare ken maternity benefits. Sumurot dagitoy kadagiti bukodda a linteg ken ahensia.
Ania ti aramiden ti NLRC?
Paragrapo (b) ken (c):
(b) The Commission shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases decided by Labor Arbiters.
(c) Cases arising from the interpretation or implementation of collective bargaining agreements and those arising from the interpretation or enforcement of company personnel policies shall be disposed of by the Labor Arbiter by referring the same to the grievance machinery and voluntary arbitration as may be provided in said agreements.
Isu a tunggal desision ti Labor Arbiter ket maiapela iti NLRC, iti uneg ti period ken kadagiti ground iti [Article 229 [223]](/law/labor-code/article-229). Dagiti dispute maipapan iti kaipapanan ti collective bargaining agreement wenno dagiti company personnel policy ket mapan iti grievance machinery ken voluntary arbitration.
Kasano a maitunos daytoy iti DOLE Regional Director?
Dua a sabali nga artikulo ti mangted kadagiti kaso iti DOLE:
- [Article 129](/law/labor-code/article-129). Ikeddeng ti DOLE Regional Director wenno hearing officer dagiti money claim no ti complaint ket saan a pakairamanan ti reinstatement ken ti dagup a claim ti tunggal empleado ket saan a nasurok ngem ₱5,000.
- Article 128. Mabalin a mangipaay ti Secretary of Labor and Employment ken dagiti naautorisar a representante iti compliance order maipapan kadagiti labor standards a nasarakan iti inspection. Kuna ti Article 128(b) nga agaplikar daytoy "Notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 129 and 217 of this Code to the contrary, and in cases where the relationship of employer-employee still exists."
No ania nga opisina ti mangala iti maysa a kaso ket agdepende kadagiti pasamak, iti gatad ken no agtrabtrabaho pay laeng ti trabahador.
Mabalin kadi nga ipila a dagus ti kaso?
Kas pagalagadan, saan. Iti sidong ti Labor Code, kas binaliwan ti Republic Act No. 10396, amin dagiti isyu a naggapu iti labor ken employment ket umuna a lumasat iti mandatory conciliation-mediation, ket ti Labor Arbiter "shall entertain only endorsed or referred cases by the duly authorized officer." Ipatungpal daytoy ti DOLE babaen ti Single Entry Approach-na. Kitaem ti [Article 234 [228]](/law/labor-code/article-234) ken kasano ti agipila iti labor complaint.
Kadawyan a saludsod
Ania dagiti kaso nga ikeddeng dagiti Labor Arbiter iti sidong ti Article 224 [217]?
Dagiti kaso ti unfair labor practice; termination dispute; kaso maipapan iti sueldo ken kasasaad ti trabaho no kadua ti claim para iti reinstatement; claim para iti damages a naggapu iti relasion ti employer ken empleado; kaso maipapan iti kinalegal ti strike ken lockout; ken dagiti sabali a money claim a naggapu iti relasion ti panagtrabaho a nasurok ngem ₱5,000, malaksid ti employees' compensation, social security, Medicare ken maternity benefits.
Apay nga Article 224 [217] ti awagna?
Iti 2015 a renumbering ti Labor Code, ti daan nga Article 217 ket nagbalin nga Article 224. Dinakamat ti Supreme Court ti panagbaliw iti Del Monte Land Transport Bus Co. v. Armenta (2021). Article 217 ti usaren dagiti nasaksakbay a desision.
Sadino ti papanan dagiti money claim a ₱5,000 wenno basbassit?
No ti complaint ket saan nga agkiddaw iti reinstatement ken ti dagup a claim ti tunggal empleado ket saan a nasurok ngem ₱5,000, ipalubos ti Article 129 nga ikeddeng daytoy ti DOLE Regional Director wenno hearing officer iti summary proceeding. Dagiti dakdakkel a claim, ken aniaman a claim a kadua ti reinstatement, ket mapan iti Labor Arbiter.
Siasino ti dumngeg kadagiti appeal manipud kadagiti Labor Arbiter?
Ited ti Article 224 iti National Labor Relations Commission ti exclusive appellate jurisdiction kadagiti amin a kaso nga inkeddeng dagiti Labor Arbiter. Ikeddeng ti Article 229 ti sangapulo a calendar day a period ken dagiti ground para iti appeal.
Mabalin kadi a mapan a dagus ti trabahador iti Labor Arbiter?
Kas pagalagadan, saan. Dagiti isyu ti labor ken employment ket umuna a lumasat iti mandatory conciliation-mediation iti sidong ti Labor Code, ket awaten laeng ti Labor Arbiter dagiti kaso nga in-endorse wenno inyawat ti naautorisar nga opisial.
Pangkabaruan laeng nga impormasion daytoy, saan a legal a pammagbaga. Para iti kasoyo, agsaludsod iti abogado, iti Public Attorney's Office (PAO) wenno iti ahensia.
Nakatulong kadi daytoy a page?