Article 292 [277] sang Labor Code: Notice kag hearing antes sang dismissal
Ang numero sa bracket, [277], amo ang daan nga numero sining article antes sang renumbering sang Labor Code sang 2015.
Status: Gin-amyendahan
Gin-amyendahan
Gin-amyendahan na ini nga probisyon. Ang teksto sa idalom amo ang subong nga bersyon.
- Gin-amyendahan sang: Republic Act No. 6715
Ano ang ginasiling sang Article 292 [277]?
Ang opisyal nga teksto sang kasuguan yara sa English.
(a) All unions are authorized to collect reasonable membership fees, union dues, assessments and fines and other contributions for labor education and research, mutual death and hospitalization benefits, welfare fund, strike fund and credit and cooperative undertakings.
(b) Subject to the constitutional right of workers to security of tenure and their right to be protected against dismissal except for a just and authorized cause and without prejudice to the requirement of notice under Article 283 of this Code, the employer shall furnish the worker whose employment is sought to be terminated a written notice containing a statement of the causes for termination and shall afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires in accordance with company rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to guidelines set by the Department of Labor and Employment. Any decision taken by the employer shall be without prejudice to the right of the worker to contest the validity or legality of his dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission. The burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause shall rest on the employer. The Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment may suspend the effects of the termination pending resolution of the dispute in the event of a prima facie finding by the appropriate official of the Department of Labor and Employment before whom such dispute is pending that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.
(c) Any employee, whether employed for a definite period or not, shall, beginning on his first day of service, be considered as an employee for purposes of membership in any labor union.
(d) No docket fee shall be assessed in labor standards disputes. In all other disputes, docket fees may be assessed against the filing party, provided that in bargaining deadlock, such fees shall be shared equally by the negotiating parties.
(e) The Minister of Labor and Employment and the Minister of the Budget shall cause to be created or reclassified in accordance with law such positions as may be necessary to carry out the objectives of this Code and cause the upgrading of the salaries of the personnel involved in the Labor Relations System of the Ministry. Funds needed for this purpose shall be provided out of the Special Activities Fund appropriated by Batas Pambansa Blg. 80 and from annual appropriations thereafter.
(f) A special Voluntary Arbitration Fund is hereby established in the Board to subsidize the cost of voluntary arbitration in cases involving the interpretation and implementation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, including the Arbitrator’s fees, and for such other related purposes to promote and develop voluntary arbitration. The Board shall administer the Special Voluntary Arbitration Fund in accordance with the guidelines it may adopt upon the recommendation of the Council, which guidelines shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of Labor and Employment. Continuing funds needed for this purpose in the initial yearly amount of fifteen million pesos (P15,000,000.00) shall be provided in the 1989 annual general appropriations acts.
The amount of subsidy in appropriate cases shall be determined by the Board in accordance with established guidelines issued by it upon the recommendation of the Council.
The Fund shall also be utilized for the operation of the Council, the training and education of Voluntary Arbitrators, and the promotion and development of a comprehensive Voluntary Arbitration Program.
(g) The Ministry shall help promote and gradually develop, with the agreement of labor organizations and employers, labor-management cooperation programs at appropriate levels of the enterprise based on shared responsibility and mutual respect in order to ensure industrial peace and improvement in productivity, working conditions and the quality of working life.
(h) In establishments where no legitimate labor organization exists, labor-management committees may be formed voluntarily by workers and employers for the purpose of promoting industrial peace. The Department of Labor and Employment shall endeavor to enlighten and educate the workers and employers on their rights and responsibilities through labor education with emphasis on the policy thrusts of this Code.
(i) To ensure speedy labor justice, the periods provided in this Code within which decisions or resolutions of labor relations cases or matters should be rendered shall be mandatory. For this purpose, a case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading or memorandum required by the rules of the Commission or by the Commission itself, or the Labor Arbiter, or the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations or Med-Arbiter, or the Regional Director.
Upon expiration of the corresponding period, a certification stating why a decision or resolution has not been rendered within the said period shall be issued forthwith by the Chairman of the Commission, the Executive Labor Arbiter, or the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations or Med-Arbiter, or the Regional Director, as the case may be, and a copy thereof served upon the parties.
Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the aforesaid officials shall, without prejudice to any liability which may have been incurred as a consequence thereof, see to it that the case or matter shall be decided or resolved without any further delay.
Basaha ang Labor Code sa website sang DOLE (daan pa ang article numbers didto, antes sang 2015)
Ano ang buot silingon sini sa simple nga tinaga?
Ang Article 292 [277] (ang [277] amo ang iya numero antes sang 2015 nga renumbering) isa ka koleksyon sang miscellaneous provisions. Ang pinakakilala nga bahin sini amo ang paragraph (b): antes tapuson sang employer ang obra sang isa ka tawo, dapat niya hatagan ang mamumugon sang sinulat nga notice sang mga rason kag sang patas nga tsansa nga mapamatian kag madepensahan ang iya kaugalingon. Ang employer ang may burden sa pagpamatuod nga ang dismissal may valid ukon authorized cause, kag pirme pwede kontrahon sang mamumugon ini sa National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).
Ang paragraph (b) lang ang ginapaathag sang sini nga pahina. Ang iban nga paragraph sang Article 292 parte sa iban nga butang, pareho sang union fees kag sang pagpadalagan sang mga opisina sang labor relations, kag wala ginapaathag diri.
Ang paragraph (b) nagasiling:
Subject to the constitutional right of workers to security of tenure and their right to be protected against dismissal except for a just and authorized cause and without prejudice to the requirement of notice under Article 283 of this Code, the employer shall furnish the worker whose employment is sought to be terminated a written notice containing a statement of the causes for termination and shall afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires in accordance with company rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to guidelines set by the Department of Labor and Employment.
Ang "Article 283" sa teksto amo ang daan nga numero sang artikulo parte sa closure kag reduction of personnel, nga subong [Article 298 [283]](/law/labor-code/article-298) na. Ang mga cross-reference sa sulod sang Code wala gin-renumber sang 2015.
Paano ini nagaobra sa matuod nga kabuhi?
Lito: husto nga notice kag hearing
Si Lito, isa ka warehouse checker, ginaakusar nga nagpalsipikar sang delivery receipts. Ginhatagan sia sang iya employer sang sinulat nga notice nga nagalista sang kaso kag sang mga fact, kag gin-imbitar sia nga magpaathag sa sinulat kag sa isa ka miting diin gindala niya ang isa ka opisyal sang union. Pagkatapos mapamatian sia, nagpadala ang employer sang ikaduha nga notice upod ang iya desisyon. Ining mga tikang nagasunod sa paragraph (b) kag sa two-notice rule.
Cora: gin-dismiss paagi sa text message
Si Cora, isa ka sales clerk, nakabaton sang text message halin sa iya manager nga nagasiling nga fired na sia tungod kay bastos sia sa isa ka kustomer. Wala sia nakabaton sang sinulat nga notice sang kaso kag wala sang tsansa nga magpaathag. Bisan mapamatud-an pa sang employer sa ulihi ang just cause, ang kakulangan sang notice kag hearing pwede magresulta sa nominal damages, pareho sa Agabon. Kon indi niya mapamatud-an ang rason, illegal ang dismissal.
Ano ang buot silingon sini sa praktis?
- Ang notice dapat sinulat kag dapat nagasiling sang mga rason sang termination.
- Ang "ample opportunity to be heard" buot silingon nga matuod nga tsansa nga sabton ang kaso, upod ang representative kon gusto sang mamumugon.
- Ang employer, indi ang mamumugon, ang dapat magpamatuod sang rason sa atubangan sang NLRC.
- Ang desisyon sang kompanya indi gid ang ulihi nga hambal: pwede mag-file ang mamumugon sang reklamo sa regional branch sang NLRC. Ang kalabanan sang mga kaso nagaagi anay sa conciliation sa DOLE: tan-awa ang paano mag-file sang labor complaint.
- Para sa mga dismissal nga wala gid sang notice, tan-awa ang Gin-fire nga wala sang notice?.
Ano ang ginapangayo sang paragraph (b) sa simple nga hambal?
Antes tapuson ang obra sang mamumugon, dapat ang employer:
- maghatag sa mamumugon sang sinulat nga notice nga nagasiling sang mga rason sang termination; kag
- maghatag sa mamumugon sang igo nga tsansa nga mapamatian kag madepensahan ang iya kaugalingon, upod ang bulig sang representative kon gusto sang mamumugon.
Ginahimo ini suno sa mga rule sang kompanya nga nagasunod sa guidelines sang DOLE. Para sa authorized causes pareho sang retrenchment ukon closure, aplikable man ang lain nga notice rule sang Article 298 [283]: sinulat nga notice sa mga mamumugon kag sa DOLE indi magnubo sa isa ka bulan antes.
Sin-o ang dapat magpamatuod sang rason sang dismissal?
Ang employer. Nagapadayon ang paragraph:
The burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause shall rest on the employer.
Gani indi kinahanglan pamatud-an sang mamumugon nga wala sia sang sala. Kon indi mapamatud-an sang employer ang just cause suno sa [Article 297 [282]](/law/labor-code/article-297) ukon ang authorized cause, indi balido ang dismissal, kag pwede mag-claim ang mamumugon sang reinstatement kag backwages suno sa [Article 294 [279]](/law/labor-code/article-294).
Pwede bala kontrahon sang mamumugon ang desisyon sang employer?
Huo. Siling sang paragraph nga ang bisan ano nga desisyon sang employer "without prejudice to the right of the worker to contest the validity or legality of his dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission." Ang imbestigasyon sang kompanya indi makakuha sang sina nga kinamatarong.
Ano ang two-notice rule?
Ginabasa sang Supreme Court ang ginapangayo nga notice kag hearing bilang two-notice rule para sa mga dismissal nga nakasandig sa just cause. Sa Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (2019), siling sang Korte: "The employer must comply with the two (2)-notice requirement, while the employee must be given an opportunity to be heard." Pareho sang ginpaathag sang Korte ang proseso sa Agabon v. NLRC (2004), ang una nga notice nagasiling sang mga basehan kon ngaa ginapangayo ang dismissal, kag ang ikaduha nga notice nagasiling sang desisyon nga i-dismiss pagkatapos mapamatian ang mamumugon.
Ano ang matabo kon laktawan sang employer ang notice kag hearing?
Kon matuod ang rason sang dismissal pero wala ginsunod ang proseso, pwede magpabilin ang dismissal, pero magabayad ang employer sang nominal damages. Sa Agabon v. NLRC (2004), gintakda ini sang Supreme Court sa ₱30,000 para sa sina nga kaso kag nagsiling nga depende ang kantidad sa mga fact. Kon wala gid sang balido nga rason, indi lang proseso ang problema: illegal ang dismissal.
San-o pwede i-suspend sang DOLE ang dismissal?
Ang ulihi nga sentence sang paragraph (b) nagahatag sa Secretary of Labor and Employment sang espesyal nga gahum:
The Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment may suspend the effects of the termination pending resolution of the dispute in the event of a prima facie finding by the appropriate official of the Department of Labor and Employment before whom such dispute is pending that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.
Aplikable lang ini sa duha ka sitwasyon: kon ang termination mahimo magresulta sa serious labor dispute, ukon kon bahin ini sang mass lay-off.
Ngaa "Article 292 [277]" ini?
Gin-renumber ang Labor Code sang 2015 paagi sa DOLE Department Advisory No. 01, series of 2015, suno sa Republic Act No. 10151. Ang bag-o nga mga desisyon sang Supreme Court nagasambit sang artikulo bilang "Article 292 [277]": pareho sang G & S Transport Corporation v. Medina (2022), Bance v. University of St. Anthony (2021) kag Ador v. T. Osada Logistics and Services (2026).
Ano nga mga desisyon sang Supreme Court ang may kaangtanan?
- Agabon v. NLRC (G.R. No. 158693)Agabon v. NLRC: balido gihapon ang dismissal tungod sa just cause bisan wala ang duha ka notice, pero dapat bayaran sang employer ang nominal damages.
- Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (G.R. No. 200811)Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower: mga OFW nga ginpahalin nga wala rason kag notice, ngaa wala nakapugong ang quitclaim, kag bug-os nga unexpired pay.
Masami nga pamangkot
Ano ang ginapangayo sang Article 292(b) [277(b)] sang Labor Code antes sang dismissal?
Dapat hatagan sang employer ang mamumugon sang sinulat nga notice nga nagasiling sang mga rason sang termination kag hatagan ang mamumugon sang igo nga tsansa nga mapamatian kag madepensahan ang iya kaugalingon, upod ang representative kon gusto sang mamumugon.
Sin-o ang dapat magpamatuod nga balido ang dismissal?
Ang employer. Siling sang Article 292(b) nga ang burden sa pagpamatuod nga ang termination may valid ukon authorized cause yara sa employer.
Pwede pa bala magkadto sa NLRC ang mamumugon nga gin-dismiss pagkatapos magdesisyon ang kompanya?
Huo. Siling sang Article 292(b) nga ang bisan ano nga desisyon sang employer indi makakuha sang kinamatarong sang mamumugon nga kontrahon ang dismissal paagi sa pag-file sang reklamo sa regional branch sang National Labor Relations Commission.
Ano ang two-notice rule?
Ginapangayo sang Supreme Court nga maghatag ang employer sang duha ka notice kag tsansa nga mapamatian antes sang dismissal tungod sa just cause. Sa Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (2019), siling sang Korte nga dapat sundon sang employer ang two-notice requirement, kag dapat hatagan ang empleyado sang tsansa nga mapamatian.
Pwede bala pundohon sang DOLE ang dismissal samtang may kaso pa?
Ginatugutan sang Article 292(b) ang Secretary of Labor and Employment nga i-suspend ang epekto sang termination samtang may reklamo, kon makita prima facie sang opisyal sang Department nga ang termination mahimo magresulta sa serious labor dispute ukon bahin sang mass lay-off.
Kinaandan nga kasayuran lang ini, indi legal nga laygay. Para sa imo kaso, pamangkot sa abogado, sa Public Attorney's Office (PAO) ukon sa ahensya.
Nakabulig bala ini nga page?