Article 292 [277] of the Labor Code: Notice and hearing before dismissal
The number in brackets, [277], is the article's number before the 2015 renumbering of the Labor Code.
Status: Amended
Amended
This provision has been amended. The text below is the current version.
- Amended by: Republic Act No. 6715
What does Article 292 [277] say?
(a) All unions are authorized to collect reasonable membership fees, union dues, assessments and fines and other contributions for labor education and research, mutual death and hospitalization benefits, welfare fund, strike fund and credit and cooperative undertakings.
(b) Subject to the constitutional right of workers to security of tenure and their right to be protected against dismissal except for a just and authorized cause and without prejudice to the requirement of notice under Article 283 of this Code, the employer shall furnish the worker whose employment is sought to be terminated a written notice containing a statement of the causes for termination and shall afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires in accordance with company rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to guidelines set by the Department of Labor and Employment. Any decision taken by the employer shall be without prejudice to the right of the worker to contest the validity or legality of his dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission. The burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause shall rest on the employer. The Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment may suspend the effects of the termination pending resolution of the dispute in the event of a prima facie finding by the appropriate official of the Department of Labor and Employment before whom such dispute is pending that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.
(c) Any employee, whether employed for a definite period or not, shall, beginning on his first day of service, be considered as an employee for purposes of membership in any labor union.
(d) No docket fee shall be assessed in labor standards disputes. In all other disputes, docket fees may be assessed against the filing party, provided that in bargaining deadlock, such fees shall be shared equally by the negotiating parties.
(e) The Minister of Labor and Employment and the Minister of the Budget shall cause to be created or reclassified in accordance with law such positions as may be necessary to carry out the objectives of this Code and cause the upgrading of the salaries of the personnel involved in the Labor Relations System of the Ministry. Funds needed for this purpose shall be provided out of the Special Activities Fund appropriated by Batas Pambansa Blg. 80 and from annual appropriations thereafter.
(f) A special Voluntary Arbitration Fund is hereby established in the Board to subsidize the cost of voluntary arbitration in cases involving the interpretation and implementation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, including the Arbitrator’s fees, and for such other related purposes to promote and develop voluntary arbitration. The Board shall administer the Special Voluntary Arbitration Fund in accordance with the guidelines it may adopt upon the recommendation of the Council, which guidelines shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of Labor and Employment. Continuing funds needed for this purpose in the initial yearly amount of fifteen million pesos (P15,000,000.00) shall be provided in the 1989 annual general appropriations acts.
The amount of subsidy in appropriate cases shall be determined by the Board in accordance with established guidelines issued by it upon the recommendation of the Council.
The Fund shall also be utilized for the operation of the Council, the training and education of Voluntary Arbitrators, and the promotion and development of a comprehensive Voluntary Arbitration Program.
(g) The Ministry shall help promote and gradually develop, with the agreement of labor organizations and employers, labor-management cooperation programs at appropriate levels of the enterprise based on shared responsibility and mutual respect in order to ensure industrial peace and improvement in productivity, working conditions and the quality of working life.
(h) In establishments where no legitimate labor organization exists, labor-management committees may be formed voluntarily by workers and employers for the purpose of promoting industrial peace. The Department of Labor and Employment shall endeavor to enlighten and educate the workers and employers on their rights and responsibilities through labor education with emphasis on the policy thrusts of this Code.
(i) To ensure speedy labor justice, the periods provided in this Code within which decisions or resolutions of labor relations cases or matters should be rendered shall be mandatory. For this purpose, a case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading or memorandum required by the rules of the Commission or by the Commission itself, or the Labor Arbiter, or the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations or Med-Arbiter, or the Regional Director.
Upon expiration of the corresponding period, a certification stating why a decision or resolution has not been rendered within the said period shall be issued forthwith by the Chairman of the Commission, the Executive Labor Arbiter, or the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations or Med-Arbiter, or the Regional Director, as the case may be, and a copy thereof served upon the parties.
Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the aforesaid officials shall, without prejudice to any liability which may have been incurred as a consequence thereof, see to it that the case or matter shall be decided or resolved without any further delay.
Read the Labor Code on the DOLE website (it uses the article numbers before 2015)
What does it mean in plain language?
Article 292 [277] ([277] is its number before the 2015 renumbering) is a collection of miscellaneous provisions. Its best known part is paragraph (b): before an employer ends someone's employment, it must give the worker a written notice of the causes and a fair chance to be heard and to defend himself or herself. The employer carries the burden of proving that the dismissal was for a valid or authorized cause, and the worker can always contest it before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).
This page explains paragraph (b) only. The other paragraphs of Article 292 deal with other matters, such as union fees and the running of labor relations offices, and are not explained here.
Paragraph (b) reads:
Subject to the constitutional right of workers to security of tenure and their right to be protected against dismissal except for a just and authorized cause and without prejudice to the requirement of notice under Article 283 of this Code, the employer shall furnish the worker whose employment is sought to be terminated a written notice containing a statement of the causes for termination and shall afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires in accordance with company rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to guidelines set by the Department of Labor and Employment.
"Article 283" in the text is the old number of the article on closure and reduction of personnel, now [Article 298 [283]](/law/labor-code/article-298). The cross-references inside the Code were not renumbered in 2015.
How does it work in real life?
Lito: a proper notice and hearing
Lito, a warehouse checker, is accused of falsifying delivery receipts. His employer gives him a written notice listing the charge and the facts, and invites him to explain in writing and at a meeting where he brings a union officer. After hearing him, the employer sends a second notice with its decision. These steps follow paragraph (b) and the two-notice rule.
Cora: dismissed by text message
Cora, a sales clerk, gets a text message from her manager saying she is fired for being rude to a customer. She gets no written notice of the charge and no chance to explain. Even if the employer later proves a just cause, the missing notice and hearing can lead to nominal damages, as in Agabon. If it cannot prove a cause, the dismissal is illegal.
What does this mean in practice?
- The notice must be written and must state the causes for the termination.
- "Ample opportunity to be heard" means a real chance to answer the charge, with a representative if the worker wants one.
- The employer, not the worker, must prove the cause before the NLRC.
- A company decision is never the last word: the worker may file a complaint with the NLRC regional branch. Most cases first go through conciliation at DOLE: see how to file a labor complaint.
- For dismissals without any notice, see Fired without notice?.
What does paragraph (b) require in plain words?
Before ending a worker's employment, the employer must:
- give the worker a written notice that states the causes for the termination; and
- give the worker ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself or herself, with the help of a representative if the worker wants one.
This is done under company rules that follow DOLE guidelines. For authorized causes such as retrenchment or closure, the separate notice rule of Article 298 [283] also applies: written notice to the workers and to DOLE at least one month before.
Who has to prove the cause for dismissal?
The employer. The paragraph continues:
The burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause shall rest on the employer.
So the worker does not have to prove that he or she did nothing wrong. If the employer cannot prove a just cause under [Article 297 [282]](/law/labor-code/article-297) or an authorized cause, the dismissal is not valid, and the worker may claim reinstatement and backwages under [Article 294 [279]](/law/labor-code/article-294).
Can the worker contest the employer's decision?
Yes. The paragraph says any decision of the employer is "without prejudice to the right of the worker to contest the validity or legality of his dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission." A company investigation does not take away that right.
What is the two-notice rule?
The Supreme Court reads the notice and hearing requirement as a two-notice rule for dismissals based on a just cause. In Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (2019), the Court said: "The employer must comply with the two (2)-notice requirement, while the employee must be given an opportunity to be heard." As the Court described the procedure in Agabon v. NLRC (2004), the first notice specifies the grounds for which dismissal is sought, and the second notice states the decision to dismiss after the worker has been heard.
What happens if the employer skips notice and hearing?
If the cause for dismissal is real but the procedure was not followed, the dismissal can stand, but the employer pays nominal damages. In Agabon v. NLRC (2004), the Supreme Court fixed them at ₱30,000 for that case and said the amount depends on the facts. If there is no valid cause at all, the problem is not only procedure: the dismissal is illegal.
When can DOLE suspend a dismissal?
The last sentence of paragraph (b) gives the Secretary of Labor and Employment a special power:
The Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment may suspend the effects of the termination pending resolution of the dispute in the event of a prima facie finding by the appropriate official of the Department of Labor and Employment before whom such dispute is pending that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.
This applies only in two situations: when the termination may cause a serious labor dispute, or when it is part of a mass lay-off.
Why is it "Article 292 [277]"?
The Labor Code was renumbered in 2015 by DOLE Department Advisory No. 01, series of 2015, following Republic Act No. 10151. Recent Supreme Court decisions cite the article as "Article 292 [277]": for example, G & S Transport Corporation v. Medina (2022), Bance v. University of St. Anthony (2021) and Ador v. T. Osada Logistics and Services (2026).
Which Supreme Court rulings are relevant?
- Agabon v. NLRC (G.R. No. 158693)Agabon v. NLRC explained: a dismissal for a just cause stays valid even without the two notices, but the employer must pay the worker nominal damages.
- Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (G.R. No. 200811)Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower explained: OFWs let go without cause or notice, why their quitclaims did not bar the case, and full unexpired pay.
Frequently asked questions
What does Article 292(b) [277(b)] of the Labor Code require before a dismissal?
The employer must give the worker a written notice stating the causes for termination and give the worker ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself or herself, with the assistance of a representative if the worker wants one.
Who has to prove that a dismissal was valid?
The employer. Article 292(b) says the burden of proving that the termination was for a valid or authorized cause rests on the employer.
Can a dismissed worker still go to the NLRC after the company decides?
Yes. Article 292(b) says any decision of the employer is without prejudice to the worker's right to contest the dismissal by filing a complaint with the regional branch of the National Labor Relations Commission.
What is the two-notice rule?
The Supreme Court requires the employer to give two notices and a chance to be heard before a dismissal for a just cause. In Aldovino v. Gold and Green Manpower (2019), the Court said the employer must comply with the two-notice requirement, while the employee must be given an opportunity to be heard.
Can DOLE stop a dismissal while the case is pending?
Article 292(b) lets the Secretary of Labor and Employment suspend the effects of the termination pending the dispute, if an official of the Department finds prima facie that the termination may cause a serious labor dispute or is in implementation of a mass lay-off.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?