Can Your Employer Transfer You to Another Branch or Post?
Quick answer
An employer in the Philippines may generally transfer employees to another branch, post or assignment. This is part of what the Supreme Court calls management prerogative. But the power is not absolute: the employer must be able to show that the transfer is not unreasonable, inconvenient or prejudicial to the employee, and does not demote the employee or cut pay or benefits. A transfer that fails this test can be constructive dismissal.
Is a transfer part of management prerogative?
Yes. Management prerogative is the employer's right to run its business, including how it assigns its workers. In Lagamayo v. Cullinan Group (2021), the Supreme Court listed the "regulation regarding transfer of employees" among the matters within management prerogative. It also said this prerogative "is not absolute".
The rules on transfers described on this page come from Supreme Court decisions.
For an overview of employment status and security of tenure, see probationary, regular and project employees.
When does a transfer become illegal?
In Telus International Philippines v. De Guzman (2019), the Court said: "for a transfer not to be considered a constructive dismissal, the employer must be able to show that such transfer is not unreasonable, inconvenient, or prejudicial to the employee; nor does it involve a demotion in rank or a diminution of his salaries, privileges and other benefits."
So a transfer may be challenged when it is:
- unreasonable or inconvenient;
- prejudicial to the employee;
- a demotion in rank; or
- a cut in salary, privileges or other benefits.
In Telus, the Court found that the transfer "was not only unreasonable, unfair, inconvenient, and prejudicial to her; it was effectively a demotion in rank and diminution of her salaries, privileges and other benefits." It denied the employer's petition and affirmed the Court of Appeals with modification.
Who has to prove that the transfer was valid?
The employer. In Telus, the Court said: "In case of a constructive dismissal, the employer has the burden of proving that the transfer and demotion of an employee are for valid and legitimate grounds such as genuine business necessity."
The employee must still first show the fact of dismissal. In Lagamayo, the Court said that even in constructive dismissal cases, the employee has the burden to prove first the fact of dismissal by substantial evidence. The employer then must show that its act was for valid or legitimate grounds and not "a mere subterfuge to get rid of an employee."
What if the transfer is constructive dismissal?
Then the employee is treated as illegally dismissed. Under Article 294 [279] of the Labor Code ([279] is its number before the 2015 renumbering):
An employee who is unjustly dismissed from work shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges and to his full backwages, inclusive of allowances, and to his other benefits or their monetary equivalent computed from the time his compensation was withheld from him up to the time of his actual reinstatement.
See Constructive dismissal: when quitting counts as being fired and Illegally dismissed: what can you get?
How does this work in real life?
These are made-up examples to show how the rules work. They are not advice for any real case.
Rosa is a bank teller in Quezon City. The bank moves her to a branch in Pasig with the same position, pay and benefits, because the Pasig branch is short of tellers. This looks like an ordinary exercise of management prerogative.
Edgar is an account manager. After he complains about unpaid commissions, he is moved to a warehouse post with no clients, a lower title and no commissions. A transfer that involves a demotion and a loss of benefits is the kind of transfer the Court said can be constructive dismissal, unless the employer proves a genuine business necessity.
Lina works in Cebu City. Her employer orders her moved to a far province within a week, with no reason given and no help with the move. Whether this is unreasonable, inconvenient or prejudicial depends on the facts, and the employer would have to show a valid business reason.
When do you need a lawyer?
Talk to a lawyer before refusing a transfer or leaving your job over one, and if a transfer came with a lower rank or less pay. Employers planning a transfer may also need advice. These cases depend on the facts and the employer's reasons. If you cannot afford a lawyer, see Free legal help in the Philippines. Complaints usually start with conciliation at DOLE: see How to file a labor complaint.
Which provisions does this answer rest on?
Frequently asked questions
Can my employer transfer me to another branch?
Generally yes. The regulation of transfers is part of management prerogative, as the Supreme Court said in Lagamayo v. Cullinan Group (2021). But the prerogative is not absolute.
When is a transfer illegal?
In Telus International Philippines v. De Guzman (2019), the Court said the employer must show that the transfer is not unreasonable, inconvenient or prejudicial to the employee, and does not involve a demotion in rank or a diminution of salaries, privileges and other benefits. If it cannot, the transfer can amount to constructive dismissal.
Who has to prove that the transfer was valid?
The employer. In Telus (2019), the Court said that in a constructive dismissal case, the employer has the burden of proving that the transfer and demotion were for valid and legitimate grounds such as genuine business necessity.
Can I refuse a transfer?
It depends on whether the transfer is valid. A valid transfer is part of management prerogative; a transfer that is unreasonable, prejudicial, a demotion or a pay cut may be constructive dismissal. Talk to a lawyer before refusing.
What can I get if a transfer was constructive dismissal?
The remedies of illegal dismissal: reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and full backwages, inclusive of allowances and other benefits, under Article 294 [279] of the Labor Code.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?