Constructive Dismissal: Meaning
Quick answer
Constructive dismissal happens when an employer does not fire an employee outright but makes continued work impossible, unreasonable or unlikely, or demotes the employee or cuts pay or benefits. The employee is pushed out of the job instead of being told to leave. The Supreme Court treats it as an illegal dismissal and calls it "a dismissal in disguise".
Also called: Dismissal in disguise, Forced resignation
Where does the idea of constructive dismissal come from?
The words "constructive dismissal" do not appear in the Labor Code. The idea comes from Supreme Court rulings. In Lagamayo v. Cullinan Group (2021), the Court defined it as "quitting or cessation of work because continued employment is rendered impossible, unreasonable or unlikely; when there is a demotion in rank or a diminution of pay and other benefits."
It protects security of tenure: an employer cannot avoid the rules on dismissal by making the employee quit.
How do courts decide if it was constructive dismissal?
In Lagamayo, the Court asked "whether a reasonable person in the employee's position would have felt compelled to give up his [or her] employment under the circumstances." The question is judged on the facts of each case.
The burden is shared:
- The employee first proves the fact of dismissal by substantial evidence.
- The employer then shows that its act had valid or legitimate grounds, such as genuine business necessity, and was not a way to get rid of the employee.
What situations have courts looked at?
- Transfers. In Telus International Philippines v. De Guzman (2019), the Court said a transfer is not constructive dismissal if the employer shows it is not unreasonable, inconvenient or prejudicial to the employee and involves no demotion in rank or cut in salary, privileges and other benefits. The transfer in that case failed the test. See Can your employer transfer you?
- Long suspensions. In Lagamayo, the Court said a mere extension of the 30-day preventive suspension is not constructive dismissal by itself. The prolonged suspension must be shown to be tainted with bad faith or malice.
Lagamayo also said that a just cause for dismissal under [Article 297 [282]](/law/labor-code/article-297) is "inherently incompatible" with constructive dismissal.
What can a constructively dismissed employee get?
The same remedies as any illegally dismissed employee under [Article 294 [279]](/law/labor-code/article-294): reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and full backwages, inclusive of allowances and other benefits, from the time pay was withheld up to actual reinstatement. See Constructive dismissal: when quitting counts as being fired and Illegally dismissed: what can you get?
Example
Made-up illustration: Nora is a branch supervisor in Iloilo City. After she questions an order from her manager, she is moved to a clerk position in a branch three hours away, at a lower salary, with no business reason given. She resigns a month later. A labor tribunal may find that a reasonable person in her place would have felt forced to leave, so her resignation may be treated as constructive dismissal.
A worker kept without any assignment for too long may face a similar question: see floating status.
Which provisions use this term?
Frequently asked questions
What is constructive dismissal in simple words?
It is a dismissal in disguise. The employer does not fire the employee outright, but makes continued work impossible, unreasonable or unlikely, or demotes the employee or cuts pay or benefits, so the employee is forced to leave.
Is constructive dismissal in the Labor Code?
The words are not in the Labor Code. The idea comes from Supreme Court rulings, such as Lagamayo v. Cullinan Group (2021). It is treated as an illegal dismissal, so the remedies of Article 294 [279] apply.
What test do courts use?
In Lagamayo (2021), the Court asked whether a reasonable person in the employee's position would have felt compelled to give up the job under the circumstances.
Who has to prove constructive dismissal?
The employee must first prove the fact of dismissal by substantial evidence. The employer must then show that its act, such as a transfer, had a valid ground like genuine business necessity and was not a way to get rid of the employee (Lagamayo, 2021).
Is a transfer to another branch constructive dismissal?
Not always. In Telus International Philippines v. De Guzman (2019), the Court said a transfer is not constructive dismissal if it is not unreasonable, inconvenient or prejudicial to the employee and involves no demotion or cut in pay and benefits.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?