Skip to content

Can Your Employer Require a Cash Bond or Deposit?

Quick answer

As a rule, an employer in the Philippines may not require workers to post a cash bond or deposit to cover loss of or damage to the employer's tools, materials or equipment. Article 114 of the Labor Code allows it only in trades where the practice is recognized, or where the Secretary of Labor finds it necessary or desirable. Deductions from wages are limited by Article 113. The Supreme Court reads these exceptions strictly against the employer and has ordered illegal cash bonds refunded.

What does the law say about deposits and cash bonds?

The rule on deposits is Article 114 of the Labor Code. Its number did not change in the 2015 renumbering:

No employer shall require his worker to make deposits from which deductions shall be made for the reimbursement of loss of or damage to tools, materials, or equipment supplied by the employer, except when the employer is engaged in such trades, occupations or business where the practice of making deductions or requiring deposits is a recognized one, or is necessary or desirable as determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment in appropriate rules and regulations.

Article 114, Labor Code

So the starting point is a ban. A deposit is allowed only in one of two cases:

  1. The employer's trade, occupation or business is one where making deductions or requiring deposits is a recognized practice.
  2. The deposit is necessary or desirable as determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment in rules and regulations.

Can a cash bond be deducted from wages?

Deductions from wages have their own rule, Article 113. It allows deductions only for insurance premiums the worker agreed to, union dues where check-off is authorized, and cases where the employer is authorized by law or by regulations of the Secretary of Labor and Employment. A cash bond taken out of each payslip must fit one of these. See can your employer deduct from your salary?

How strictly does the Supreme Court read these rules?

Strictly, against the employer. In Niña Jewelry Manufacturing v. Montecillo (2011), a jewelry maker adopted a new policy requiring its goldsmiths to post cash bonds of up to 15% of their weekly pay, or to sign authorizations for deductions. The Court said Article 113 has only three exceptions, and Article 114 allows deposits only in the cases it lists. It added that it would strictly construe the rules against the employer because "the posting of cash bonds and the making of deductions from the wages would inarguably impose an additional burden upon the employees."

The Court said the employer was "not absolutely precluded from imposing the new policy," but could do so only by complying with the requirements of the law. In that case, the ruling that the policy lacked legal basis stood, although the Court found that the workers were not constructively dismissed.

Two later cases ordered refunds:

  • In Agapito v. Aeroplus Multi-Services (2022), the Court found that a monthly cash bond had been illegally deducted from the worker's wages and ordered the total reimbursed, with 6% legal interest.
  • In John Kriska Logistics v. Mendoza (2023), the Court upheld an order to refund a weekly cash bond, computed for three years only because of the three-year limit on money claims in [Article 306 [291]](/law/labor-code/article-306).

What about deductions for losses or shortages?

The implementing rules of the Labor Code (Book III, Rule VIII, Section 14, in the 1989 text on the Supreme Court E-Library) deal with deductions for loss or damage. They apply where the employer is in a trade, occupation or business where deductions or deposits are a recognized practice, and they set four conditions:

  1. The employee is clearly shown to be responsible for the loss or damage.
  2. The employee is given a reasonable opportunity to show cause why the deduction should not be made.
  3. The amount is fair and reasonable and does not exceed the actual loss or damage.
  4. The deduction does not exceed 20 percent of the employee's wages in a week.

DOLE may have issued later rules that are not reflected here.

Can someone force me to give up part of my wages?

No. Article 116 says:

It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to withhold any amount from the wages of a worker or induce him to give up any part of his wages by force, stealth, intimidation, threat or by any other means whatsoever without the worker’s consent.

Article 116, Labor Code

The article names intimidation and threat among the forbidden means. Whether a worker really consented is decided on the facts of each case.

How does this work in real life?

These are made-up examples to show how the rules work. They are not advice for any real case.

Carla is hired as a cashier at a grocery. On her first payday, her employer deducts an amount labeled "cash bond" without her written authority. As in Agapito, a cash bond deduction that does not fit Article 113 can be ordered refunded with legal interest.

Benny works in a shop where a tool went missing. The owner deducts the full price of the tool from his week's pay without asking him to explain. Under the implementing rules, a deduction for loss needs proof that Benny was responsible, a chance for him to explain, an amount not more than the actual loss, and a limit of 20 percent of his weekly wages.

Rhea worked for five years in a warehouse where a cash bond was deducted every week. When she resigns, she asks for it back. As in John Kriska, a refund claim is limited by the three-year deadline for money claims.

When do you need a lawyer?

Talk to a lawyer, your union or the Public Attorney's Office if a large cash bond is not returned, if deductions are taken without your written consent, or if you were told to sign a bond or deduction form to keep your job. Employers planning a cash bond or loss policy also need legal advice on whether their business qualifies. If you cannot afford a lawyer, see Free legal help in the Philippines.

Which provisions does this answer rest on?

Frequently asked questions

Is a cash bond from employees legal in the Philippines?

Only in limited cases. Article 114 of the Labor Code forbids requiring deposits for loss of or damage to the employer's tools, materials or equipment, except in trades or businesses where the practice is recognized, or where it is necessary or desirable as determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment.

How strictly does the Supreme Court read the rules on cash bonds?

Strictly. In Niña Jewelry Manufacturing v. Montecillo (2011), the Supreme Court said it would construe the rules strictly against the employer, because cash bonds and wage deductions impose an additional burden on employees. An employer may impose such a policy only upon compliance with the requirements of the law.

Can my employer deduct a cash bond from my salary?

A deduction from wages must fit one of the three cases in Article 113. In Agapito v. Aeroplus Multi-Services (2022), a monthly cash bond deducted from wages was found illegal and ordered reimbursed with legal interest.

Can my employer deduct for a loss or shortage I caused?

The implementing rules (1989 text) allow it in businesses where deductions or deposits are recognized, and only if the employee is clearly shown to be responsible, is given a chance to explain, the amount is fair and not more than the actual loss, and the deduction does not exceed 20 percent of the employee's wages in a week.

Can I get my cash bond back?

Refunds have been ordered. In Agapito (2022), the Supreme Court found a monthly cash bond illegally deducted and ordered it reimbursed with legal interest. In John Kriska Logistics v. Mendoza (2023), it upheld an award refunding a weekly cash bond, limited to three years under the deadline for money claims.

Is it a crime to take part of my wages by force or threat?

Article 116 of the Labor Code makes it unlawful for any person to withhold any amount from a worker's wages, or to make the worker give up part of the wages, by force, stealth, intimidation, threat or any other means without the worker's consent.

General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.

Share this page

Was this page helpful?

Report outdated or incorrect info

Do not include personal details such as your name, ID numbers or passwords.