Article 281 of the Revised Penal Code: Other forms of trespass
Status: Amended
Amended
This provision has been amended. The text below is the current version.
- Amended by: Republic Act No. 10951 (Wording as amended by this law.)
What does Article 281 say?
The penalty of arresto menor or a fine not exceeding- Forty thousand pesos (P40,000), or both, shall be imposed upon any person who shall enter the closed premises or the fenced estate of another, while either oi' both of them are uninhabited, if the prohibition to enter be manifest and the trespasser has not- secured the permission of the owner or the caretaker thereof.
What does it mean in plain language?
Article 281 punishes a person who enters the closed premises or the fenced estate of another, while the place is uninhabited, when the prohibition to enter is manifest and he or she has no permission from the owner or the caretaker. The penalty is arresto menor (1 to 30 days), a fine of up to ₱40,000, or both.
This is the lighter trespass crime. It protects closed buildings and fenced land where nobody lives, such as a vacant lot, a locked warehouse or a fenced farm. Entering a home where someone lives is the heavier crime in Article 280.
How does it work in real life?
Jay: a shortcut through a fenced vacant lot
Jay, an adult, climbs over the fence of Aling Nena's vacant lot to take a shortcut. The gate is locked and a sign says "No Trespassing". Nobody lives on the lot, the prohibition is clear, and he had no permission. This fits Article 281.
Dindo: mangoes from the same lot
Dindo climbs into the same fenced lot and picks mangoes from its trees. Entering an enclosed estate where trespass is forbidden, without the owner's consent, to gather fruit is one of the kinds of theft in Article 308. So his act raises a theft question, not only trespass.
Weng: the caretaker said yes
Weng wants to inspect a locked warehouse that is for sale. The caretaker opens the gate and lets her in. She had the caretaker's permission, so Article 281 does not apply.
What does this mean in practice?
- Whether entry was clearly forbidden is a question of evidence, such as a fence, a locked gate or a sign.
- If something was damaged on the property, the case may also involve malicious mischief. See Malicious mischief.
- For more on trespass, see Trespass to dwelling in the Philippines. For help with a specific case, see Free legal help in the Philippines.
What are the elements of Article 281?
Read word by word, the article has four parts:
- Closed premises or a fenced estate of another. A building that is closed, or land enclosed by a fence.
- The place is uninhabited. Nobody lives there.
- The prohibition to enter is manifest. It is clear that entry is not allowed.
- No permission from the owner or the caretaker.
All four must be present. An open, unfenced lot does not fit. Neither does a place where entry is not clearly forbidden.
How is it different from trespass to dwelling?
| Article 280 | Article 281 | |
|---|---|---|
| Place | A dwelling where someone lives | Closed premises or a fenced estate, uninhabited |
| What makes it a crime | Entry against the dweller's will | Entry despite a manifest prohibition, without the owner's or caretaker's permission |
| Penalty | Arresto mayor and a fine of up to ₱200,000; heavier with violence or intimidation | Arresto menor, a fine of up to ₱40,000, or both |
What changed with Republic Act No. 10951?
The 1930 text of Article 281 set a fine of not more than 200 pesos. Republic Act No. 10951 (2017) raised it to not more than ₱40,000. On the Supreme Court E-Library copy of that law, the section that rewrites Article 281 is headed "Article 283", although the text it prints is Article 281, "Other forms of trespass". This page cites it by article.
Frequently asked questions
What is the penalty for trespassing on a vacant lot?
If the lot is fenced, nobody lives there, entry is clearly forbidden and the person had no permission, Article 281 as amended by Republic Act No. 10951 provides arresto menor (1 to 30 days), a fine of up to ₱40,000, or both.
What is the difference between Article 280 and Article 281?
Article 280 protects a dwelling, the place where someone lives, and punishes entry against the dweller's will. Article 281 covers closed premises or fenced estates that are uninhabited, when the prohibition to enter is manifest. Its penalty is lighter.
Is a 'No Trespassing' sign needed?
Article 281 requires that the prohibition to enter be manifest, meaning clear. A sign is one way to show it. A locked gate or other facts may also show it. The court decides on the evidence.
Who can give permission to enter?
Article 281 names the owner or the caretaker. A person who entered with the permission of either of them does not commit this crime.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?