Direct Assault vs Resistance and Disobedience
Quick answer
Direct assault and resistance are both crimes against persons in authority and their agents, such as officials and police officers, while they perform their duties. The difference is how serious the act is. Direct assault under Article 148 needs an attack, force, serious intimidation or serious resistance. When the force or resistance is not serious, the crime is resistance and disobedience under Article 151, which carries a lighter penalty.
| Aspect | Direct assault (Art. 148) | Resistance and disobedience (Art. 151) | Legal basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| What the offender does | Attacks, employs force, seriously intimidates or seriously resists a person in authority or an agent, without a public uprising. Using force or intimidation for the aims of rebellion or sedition, without a public uprising, is the other way. | Resists or seriously disobeys a person in authority or an agent. A disobedience to an agent that is not serious is punished more lightly (second paragraph). | Article 148, Revised Penal Code, Article 151, Revised Penal Code |
| How serious the force must be | Serious. In Mallari v. People (2020), the Court said the laying of hands or physical force against an agent must be serious to be direct assault. | Force or resistance that is not dangerous, grave or severe falls here. In Balsamo v. People (2023), the Court said the two crimes have similar elements, "varying only as to the degree of seriousness of the offender's resistance". | |
| Who is protected | A person in authority or an agent of a person in authority (Art. 152). | The same persons (Art. 152). | Article 148, Revised Penal Code, Article 151, Revised Penal Code |
| When it must happen | While the person is engaged in the performance of official duties, or on occasion of such performance. | While the person is engaged in the performance of official duties. | Article 148, Revised Penal Code, Article 151, Revised Penal Code |
| Penalty, as the articles now read (RA 10951) | Prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods and a fine of up to ₱200,000 when the assault is committed with a weapon or the offender lays hands upon a person in authority, as the official text of RA 10951 reads; otherwise prision correccional in its minimum period and a fine of up to ₱100,000. | Arresto mayor and a fine of up to ₱100,000. For a disobedience to an agent that is not serious: arresto menor or a fine of ₱2,000 to ₱20,000. | Article 148, Revised Penal Code, Article 151, Revised Penal Code |
| If the charge is direct assault but only resistance is proved | The court cannot convict of direct assault if the force was not serious. | The court may convict of resistance instead: "Direct assault necessarily includes resistance or disobedience" (Balsamo, 2023). |
What do the two articles say?
Article 148 describes direct assault this way (the penalty part follows below):
Any person or person who, without a public uprising, shall employ force or intimidation for the attainment of any of the purposes enumerated in defining the crimes of rebellion and sedition, or shall attack, employ force, or seriously intimidate or resist any person in authority or any of his agents, while engaged in the performance of official duties, or on occasion of such performance,
Article 151 covers what is left:
The penalty of arresto mayor and a fine not exceeding One hundred thousand pesos (P100, 000) shall be imposed upon any person who not being included in the provisions of the preceding articles shall resist or seriously disobey any person in authority or the agents of such person while engaged in the performance of official duties.
The words "not being included in the provisions of the preceding articles" mean that Article 151 applies only when the act is not direct assault.
What makes force "serious"?
The Supreme Court has drawn the line in two recent cases.
- In Mallari v. People (2020), the Court said that when a person being apprehended by a police officer "resists or uses force that is not dangerous, grave, or severe, the offense is not direct assault". The proper offense is resistance and disobedience to an agent of a person in authority under Article 151. It also said: "To be considered as direct assault, the laying of hands or the use of physical force against the agent of a person in authority must be serious."
- In Balsamo v. People (2023), a man running from a police officer who had grabbed his arm punched the officer in the chest and then shut his gate on the officer's fingers. The Court said the force in direct assault "must be serious or more than a sudden blow, slapping, or punching", and found him guilty of resistance to an agent of a person in authority. It added that the two crimes have similar elements, "varying only as to the degree of seriousness of the offender's resistance".
What must be proved for direct assault?
In Balsamo (2023), the Court listed the elements of the second way of committing direct assault:
- the offender makes an attack, employs force, makes a serious intimidation, or makes a serious resistance;
- the person assaulted is a person in authority or an agent;
- at that moment the person is performing official duties, or is assaulted because of past performance of official duties;
- the offender knows the person is a person in authority or an agent exercising official duties; and
- there is no public uprising.
For resistance under Article 151, Mallari (2020) quoted two elements: a person in authority or an agent is performing an official duty or gives a lawful order, and the offender resists or seriously disobeys.
Who is a person in authority or an agent?
Article 152 defines both (see person in authority). Persons in authority include anyone directly vested with jurisdiction and the barangay chairman. Agents include those charged with keeping public order and protecting life and property, and anyone who comes to the aid of persons in authority. The Local Government Code (Section 388) also treats the punong barangay, the sangguniang barangay members and the members of the lupong tagapamayapa as persons in authority in their barangays. In Mallari (2020), the Court said: "A police officer is an agent of a person in authority."
For Articles 148 and 151 only, Article 152 adds teachers, professors, persons supervising public or duly recognized private schools, colleges and universities, and lawyers in the actual performance of their professional duties. In Gelig v. People (2010), a parent who slapped and pushed a public school teacher inside the school was convicted of direct assault, because the teacher was attending to her official functions at that moment.
How do the penalties compare?
As both articles now read on the official text of Republic Act No. 10951 (2017):
| Crime | Penalty |
|---|---|
| Direct assault with a weapon, or when the offender lays hands upon a person in authority | Prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods and a fine of up to ₱200,000 |
| Direct assault in other cases | Prision correccional in its minimum period and a fine of up to ₱100,000 |
| Resisting or seriously disobeying a person in authority or an agent | Arresto mayor and a fine of up to ₱100,000 |
| Disobedience to an agent that is not serious | Arresto menor or a fine of ₱2,000 to ₱20,000 |
Fines shown in older decisions, such as Mallari and Balsamo, are the old amounts that applied to facts before RA 10951. For how long each penalty lasts, see the duration of penalties table, and for more detail, direct assault: penalty and examples and resisting or disobeying a person in authority.
How does this work in real life?
These are made-up examples to show how the rules work. They are not advice for any real case.
Ana pulls her arm away and pushes a police officer who grabs her during a street argument. The push is not dangerous, grave or severe. Following Mallari and Balsamo, this may be resistance under Article 151, not direct assault.
Rodel hits a barangay chairman with a piece of wood while the chairman is settling a dispute. A barangay chairman is a person in authority, he was performing his duties, and the attack was with a weapon. This may be direct assault with the higher penalty.
Joy refuses to move her parked car when a police officer on duty tells her to, but walks away without any force. Whether her refusal is a serious disobedience, or a lighter one under the second paragraph of Article 151, depends on the facts the court finds.
See also the table of persons in authority and agents.
When do you need a lawyer?
Talk to a lawyer if you are charged with direct assault or resistance, or if you were hurt while performing official duties and want to follow the case. Whether the force was serious, whether the officer was on duty, and whether the offender knew who the officer was are decided on the evidence, and they decide which crime applies. If you cannot afford a lawyer, see Free legal help in the Philippines for the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) and other options.
Which provisions does this answer rest on?
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between direct assault and resistance?
The seriousness of the force. In Mallari v. People (2020) and Balsamo v. People (2023), the Supreme Court held that force against an agent of a person in authority must be serious to be direct assault under Article 148. Force or resistance that is not serious is resistance or disobedience under Article 151.
Is pushing a police officer direct assault?
Not always. A police officer is an agent of a person in authority. In Mallari (2020), resistance with force that was not dangerous, grave or severe was held to be resistance under Article 151, not direct assault. The court decides on the evidence how serious the force was.
Can a person charged with direct assault be convicted of resistance?
Yes. In Balsamo (2023), the charge was direct assault, but the Court found only resistance proved and convicted of that crime, saying that direct assault necessarily includes resistance or disobedience.
Is slapping a teacher direct assault?
It can be. Article 152 treats teachers as persons in authority for Articles 148 and 151. In Gelig v. People (2010), a parent who slapped and pushed a public school teacher inside the school while the teacher was attending to her duties was convicted of direct assault.
Does the offender need to know the person is a police officer or official?
Yes. In Balsamo (2023), the Court listed as an element of direct assault that the offender knows the person assaulted is a person in authority or an agent exercising official duties.
Is a lawyer a person in authority?
For Articles 148 and 151 only. Article 152, as worded by Batas Pambansa Blg. 873, treats lawyers in the actual performance of their professional duties, or on the occasion of such performance, as persons in authority.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?