Direct Assault: Meaning
Quick answer
Direct assault is a crime against public order under Article 148 of the Revised Penal Code. In most cases it means attacking, using force on, seriously intimidating or resisting a person in authority, or an agent of one, while that person is performing official duties or because of those duties. If the force used against an agent is not serious, the crime may be only resistance or disobedience under Article 151.
Also called: Direct assault upon a person in authority, Assault on a person in authority
What does Article 148 punish?
The article punishes any person who:
without a public uprising, shall employ force or intimidation for the attainment of any of the purposes enumerated in defining the crimes of rebellion and sedition, or shall attack, employ force, or seriously intimidate or resist any person in authority or any of his agents, while engaged in the performance of official duties, or on occasion of such performance,
In Gelig v. People (2010), the Supreme Court read this as two ways of committing the crime: for the aims of rebellion or sedition, or against a person in authority or an agent. Almost every case is about the second way. See the full explanation of Article 148.
What must be proved?
In Balsamo v. People (2023), the Supreme Court listed five elements for the second way:
- the offender attacks, uses force, makes a serious intimidation or makes a serious resistance;
- the person assaulted is a person in authority or an agent;
- at that time the person was performing official duties, or was assaulted because of past performance of official duties;
- the offender knows that the one assaulted is a person in authority or an agent exercising official duties;
- there is no public uprising.
When is it only resistance?
When the force against an agent is not serious. In Mallari v. People (2020), the Court said: "To be considered as direct assault, the laying of hands or the use of physical force against the agent of a person in authority must be serious." In Balsamo, it said the force involved in direct assault "must be serious or more than a sudden blow, slapping, or punching", and added that direct assault necessarily includes resistance or disobedience. Resistance is punished by Article 151, with a lighter penalty. See resisting or disobeying a person in authority.
What is the penalty?
As the article now reads on the official text of Republic Act No. 10951:
| Situation | Penalty |
|---|---|
| The assault is committed with a weapon, or the offender lays hands upon a person in authority | Prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods (2 years, 4 months and 1 day to 6 years) and a fine not exceeding ₱200,000 |
| None of those circumstances | Prision correccional in its minimum period (6 months and 1 day to 2 years and 4 months) and a fine not exceeding ₱100,000 |
The durations come from Article 27 and the Article 76 table; see prision correccional. Decisions on facts that happened before Republic Act No. 10951 (2017), such as Gelig, Mallari and Balsamo, show older and much smaller fines, which are not today's fines. More on the penalty: direct assault penalty.
Example
Made-up illustration: Nonoy is angry at the barangay chairman over a decision in a dispute. The next day he hits the chairman with a stick because of that decision. The chairman is a person in authority, the attack is linked to his official duties, and a weapon was used, so this may be direct assault with the heavier penalty. Ana, in another case, pushes away a police officer who grabbed her arm during a street argument. If the push was not serious force, Mallari and Balsamo point to resistance under Article 151 instead. The court decides on the evidence.
See also the comparison direct assault vs resistance and disobedience.
Which provisions use this term?
Frequently asked questions
What is direct assault in simple words?
It is the crime in Article 148 of the Revised Penal Code. Most cases involve a person who, without a public uprising, attacks, uses force on, seriously intimidates or resists a person in authority or an agent while that person is performing official duties, or because of that performance.
What are the two ways to commit direct assault?
In Gelig v. People (2010), the Supreme Court said direct assault may be committed in two ways: by using force or intimidation for the aims of rebellion or sedition without a public uprising, or by attacking, using force on, or seriously intimidating or resisting a person in authority or an agent on duty.
What are the elements of direct assault?
In Balsamo v. People (2023), the Court listed five for the second way: an attack, force, serious intimidation or serious resistance; the victim is a person in authority or an agent; the victim was performing official duties or was assaulted because of past duties; the offender knew who the victim was; and there was no public uprising.
Is every push against a police officer direct assault?
No. In Mallari v. People (2020) and Balsamo v. People (2023), the Supreme Court held that force against an agent of a person in authority must be serious to be direct assault. Force that is not serious is resistance or disobedience under Article 151.
What is the penalty for direct assault?
As Article 148 now reads on the official text of Republic Act No. 10951, it is prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods and a fine of up to ₱200,000 when a weapon is used or the offender lays hands upon a person in authority, and prision correccional in its minimum period and a fine of up to ₱100,000 in other cases.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?