Can Spouses Separate Their Property While Still Married?
Quick answer
Yes, but only through the court. Under Article 134 of the Family Code, spouses who did not agree on separation of property in a prenuptial agreement can separate their property during the marriage only by a judicial order. They can ask for it together (voluntary separation, Article 136), or one spouse can ask for it for a cause listed in Article 135, such as abandonment or living apart for at least one year with no real chance of reconciliation. A private agreement alone does not do it.
What does the law say?
In the absence of an express declaration in the marriage settlements, the separation of property between spouses during the marriage shall not take place except by judicial order. Such judicial separation of property may either be voluntary or for sufficient cause.
"Marriage settlements" means a prenuptial agreement made before the wedding. Without one, a marriage under the Family Code is under absolute community of property (Article 75). Many marriages celebrated before the Family Code took effect are under conjugal partnership of gains. See Absolute community vs conjugal partnership. For an overview of the property regimes, see property of spouses: who owns what in a marriage.
What causes can a spouse invoke?
Article 135 lists the causes:
Any of the following shall be considered sufficient cause for judicial separation of property: (1) That the spouse of the petitioner has been sentenced to a penalty which carries with it civil interdiction; (2) That the spouse of the petitioner has been judicially declared an absentee; (3) That loss of parental authority of the spouse of petitioner has been decreed by the court; (4) That the spouse of the petitioner has abandoned the latter or failed to comply with his or her obligations to the family as provided for in Article 101; (5) That the spouse granted the power of administration in the marriage settlements has abused that power; and (6) That at the time of the petition, the spouses have been separated in fact for at least one year and reconciliation is highly improbable.
For causes (1), (2) and (3), Article 135 says presenting the final judgment against the guilty or absent spouse is enough basis for the decree.
Cause (4) refers to Article 101. Under that article, a spouse who leaves the conjugal dwelling for three months, or gives no news of his or her whereabouts for the same period, is presumed to have no intention of returning. "Obligations to the family" there means marital, parental or property obligations.
Can both spouses ask for it together?
Yes:
The spouses may jointly file a verified petition with the court for the voluntary dissolution of the absolute community or the conjugal partnership of gains, and for the separation of their common properties.
The same article protects creditors. All creditors of the community or partnership, and the personal creditors of each spouse, must be listed in the petition and notified. The court "shall take measures to protect the creditors and other persons with pecuniary interest."
Is this the same as legal separation or annulment?
No. Judicial separation of property only changes the property regime. The spouses stay married, and they are not legally separated. Legal separation and annulment are different cases with their own grounds: see grounds for legal separation.
Does living apart change the property regime by itself?
No. Article 100 says "The separation in fact between husband and wife shall not affect the regime of absolute community", except for three effects: the spouse who left without just cause loses the right to be supported, transactions that need the other's consent need court authorization in a summary proceeding, and the separate property of both spouses answers for family support if the community property is not enough. Article 127 gives the same rule for the conjugal partnership.
Only after at least one year apart, with reconciliation highly improbable, can a spouse ask the court to separate the property (Article 135(6)).
How does this work in real life?
These are made-up examples to show how the rules work. They are not advice for any real case.
Kara and Leo. They married without a prenup and have lived apart for two years. Neither expects to reconcile. Either of them may ask the court for separation of property under Article 135(6). Or both may file a joint verified petition under Article 136, listing all their creditors.
Ian and Joy. Ian left the family home and has given no news for more than three months. Under Article 101 he is presumed not to intend to return. Joy may ask the court for separation of property, for receivership, or to be the sole administrator of the community property. See What can you do if your spouse abandoned the family?
Mario and Nena. They want separate property but have no prenup and are not in conflict. Signing a private agreement between themselves is not enough: under Article 134, separation during the marriage needs a court order.
To choose separation of property without a court, couples must agree on it before the wedding: see prenuptial agreement in the Philippines.
When do you need a lawyer?
A petition for separation of property is a court case, so talk to a lawyer before filing. A lawyer can check which cause applies, prepare the verified petition, list the creditors and explain what happens to the house, the business and the debts. This page does not describe the procedure or the costs: no official source read for it gives them.
If you cannot afford a lawyer, see Free legal help in the Philippines for the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) and other options.
Which provisions does this answer rest on?
Frequently asked questions
Can a married couple separate their property without going to court?
Not after the wedding. Article 134 of the Family Code says that unless the marriage settlement provides for it, separation of property during the marriage takes place only by judicial order. Only a prenuptial agreement can set separation of property without a court.
What are the grounds for judicial separation of property?
Article 135 lists six: the other spouse was sentenced to a penalty with civil interdiction, was declared an absentee, lost parental authority, abandoned the petitioner or failed in family obligations, abused the power of administration, or the spouses have been separated in fact for at least one year and reconciliation is highly improbable.
Can both spouses agree to separate their property?
Yes, with the court's approval. Article 136 lets the spouses jointly file a verified petition for voluntary dissolution of the absolute community or conjugal partnership. All creditors must be listed and notified.
Do we need to be legally separated first?
No. Judicial separation of property is a separate remedy from legal separation. Article 134 says it may be voluntary or for sufficient cause, and the causes in Article 135 do not require a decree of legal separation.
Does living apart end the property regime?
No. Article 100 says separation in fact does not affect the absolute community, with some exceptions. But being separated in fact for at least one year, with reconciliation highly improbable, is a cause to ask the court for separation of property (Article 135(6)).
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?