Unlawful Detainer: Meaning in Philippine Law
Quick answer
Unlawful detainer is a court case to recover possession of a house or land from someone who refuses to leave after his or her right to stay has ended. The occupant's stay was lawful at the start, for example under a lease or with the owner's permission. It must be filed in the Municipal Trial Court within one year from the last demand to vacate.
What does the law say?
Rule 70, Section 1 of the Rules of Court lets a lessor, vendor, vendee or other person go to court when possession of land or a building "is unlawfully withheld after the expiration or termination of the right to hold possession, by virtue of any contract, express or implied". The case must be brought "at any time within one (1) year" in the proper Municipal Trial Court. For leases, Article 1673 of the Civil Code lists grounds to eject a lessee, such as an expired lease, unpaid rent or a violated condition.
In Spouses Valdez v. Court of Appeals (2006), the Supreme Court explained the key point: in unlawful detainer, "possession of the defendant is originally legal but became illegal due to the expiration or termination of the right to possess." The one year runs "from the date of last demand".
How is it different from forcible entry?
In forcible entry, the occupant got in by force, intimidation, threat, strategy or stealth, so the possession was illegal from day one. In unlawful detainer, it became illegal only later. See Forcible entry vs unlawful detainer.
Valdez adds that a case based on tolerance needs tolerance from the very start of the stay. If more than one year has passed, the case is no longer unlawful detainer but an accion publiciana, an ordinary civil case to decide who has the better right of possession.
What comes before filing?
- A demand. For a lessor, Rule 70, Section 2 requires a demand to pay or comply with the lease and to vacate. The case may be filed only if the tenant does not comply within 15 days for land or 5 days for buildings, unless the lease says otherwise.
- Barangay conciliation, when it applies. Under Rule 70, Section 12, a case that needed barangay conciliation first is dismissed without prejudice if there is no showing that it was done. See Do I need to go to the barangay first?.
- Rent control, for covered units. If the unit is covered by the Rent Control Act, Section 9 of Republic Act No. 9653 limits the grounds for ejectment. For example, unpaid rent is a ground there only when the arrears total three months.
Example
Made-up illustration: Tony rents an apartment to Mae month to month. Mae stops paying. Tony gives her a written demand to pay and leave. Mae does not comply within 5 days. Tony may file unlawful detainer in the Municipal Trial Court within one year from his last demand, after barangay conciliation if it applies. For a covered unit, the Rent Control Act grounds must also be met. For the steps, see How to evict a tenant who will not leave.
Frequently asked questions
What is unlawful detainer in simple words?
It is a court case to get back a house or land from a person who first stayed there lawfully, by lease or by permission, but refuses to leave after the right to stay ended.
What is the difference between unlawful detainer and forcible entry?
In forcible entry, the occupant's possession was illegal from the start (entry by force, intimidation, threat, strategy or stealth). In unlawful detainer, it was legal at first and became illegal later (Spouses Valdez v. Court of Appeals, 2006).
How long do I have to file an unlawful detainer case?
One year. In Spouses Valdez v. Court of Appeals (2006), the Supreme Court said unlawful detainer must be filed within one year from the date of last demand.
Where is an unlawful detainer case filed?
In the proper Municipal Trial Court, under Rule 70, Section 1 of the Rules of Court. If more than one year has passed, the Supreme Court said in Valdez that the case is no longer unlawful detainer but an accion publiciana, an ordinary case on the better right of possession.
Do I need to send a demand first?
For a lessor, yes, unless the lease says otherwise. Rule 70, Section 2 requires a demand to pay or comply with the lease and to vacate, and the case is filed only if the tenant does not comply within 15 days for land or 5 days for buildings.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?