Article 2180 of the Civil Code: Liability of employers, parents and schools for others
Status: In force
What does Article 2180 say?
The obligation imposed by article 2176 is demandable not only for one’s own acts or omissions, but also for those of persons for whom one is responsible.
The father and, in case of his death or incapacity, the mother, are responsible for the damages caused by the minor children who live in their company.
Guardians are liable for damages caused by the minors or incapacitated persons who are under their authority and live in their company.
The owners and managers of an establishment or enterprise are likewise responsible for damages caused by their employees in the service of the branches in which the latter are employed or on the occasion of their functions.
Employers shall be liable for the damages caused by their employees and household helpers acting within the scope of their assigned tasks, even though the former are not engaged in any business or industry.
The State is responsible in like manner when it acts through a special agent; but not when the damage has been caused by the official to whom the task done properly pertains, in which case what is provided in article 2176 shall be applicable.
Lastly, teachers or heads of establishments of arts and trades shall be liable for damages caused by their pupils and students or apprentices, so long as they remain in their custody.
The responsibility treated of in this article shall cease when the persons herein mentioned prove that they observed all the diligence of a good father of a family to prevent damage.
What does it mean in plain language?
Article 2180 of the Civil Code says that a person can be liable not only for his own careless acts, but also for those of people he is responsible for. It names parents, guardians, owners and managers of businesses, employers, the State in some cases, and teachers. They pay for the damage unless they prove they used "all the diligence of a good father of a family" to prevent it.
This is called vicarious liability: one person answers for another's act. It builds on Article 2176, which makes whoever causes damage by fault or negligence pay for it (a quasi-delict when there is no contract).
How does it work in real life?
Ramon and the company van
Ramon drives a delivery van for a company. During a delivery, he runs a red light and hits a jeepney. The company can be liable for the damage, because Ramon was acting within his assigned tasks. The company is freed only if it proves it observed all the diligence of a good father of a family to prevent the damage.
Lito's son and the broken window
Lito's 15-year-old son lives with him. While playing, the boy throws a stone and breaks a neighbor's car window. The neighbor may claim the repair cost from Lito as the parent (Article 2180 and Family Code Article 221). Lito may defend himself by proving he observed all the diligence of a good father of a family to prevent the damage.
Sara and the household driver
Sara hires a driver for her family. On his day off, he takes his own motorcycle out and causes an accident. Article 2180 covers helpers acting "within the scope of their assigned tasks". A ride on his day off, on his own motorcycle, does not look like an assigned task. A court would look at the facts, but this article may not reach Sara.
These are made-up examples to show how the rule works. They are not advice for any real case.
What does this mean in practice?
- The victim can still sue the person who directly caused the damage under Article 2176. Article 2180 adds another person who may be liable.
- Whoever pays for the damage caused by his dependents or employees may recover the amount from them (Article 2181).
- If a minor who causes damage has no parents or guardian, he answers with his own property (Article 2182).
- For car accidents, the owner's liability also depends on whether he was in the car. See is the car owner liable for the driver's accident? and what to do after a road accident.
- For the rights of household helpers, see kasambahay rights.
- For free or low-cost legal help, see where to find legal help.
What does Article 2180 say?
The first paragraph sets the rule:
The obligation imposed by article 2176 is demandable not only for one’s own acts or omissions, but also for those of persons for whom one is responsible.
The article then lists who is responsible for whom. In plain words:
| Who is liable | For whom | When |
|---|---|---|
| The father and, if he has died or is incapacitated, the mother | Their minor children | Who live in their company |
| Guardians | Minors or incapacitated persons under their authority | Who live in their company |
| Owners and managers of an establishment or enterprise | Their employees | In the service of the branch where they work, or on the occasion of their functions |
| Employers | Their employees and household helpers | Acting within the scope of their assigned tasks, even if the employer has no business |
| The State | A special agent | Only when it acts through a special agent |
| Teachers or heads of establishments of arts and trades | Their pupils, students or apprentices | While these remain in their custody |
Can an employer avoid liability?
Yes. The last paragraph gives a defense to everyone in the list:
The responsibility treated of in this article shall cease when the persons herein mentioned prove that they observed all the diligence of a good father of a family to prevent damage.
The article puts the burden on the employer, parent or teacher: the responsibility ceases only when they "prove" this diligence. Whether the proof is enough is for the court to decide on the facts.
The line on employers is broad:
Employers shall be liable for the damages caused by their employees and household helpers acting within the scope of their assigned tasks, even though the former are not engaged in any business or industry.
So a family that hires a driver or a kasambahay can also be liable, if the damage happened while the helper was doing an assigned task.
What does the Family Code add for parents and schools?
The Family Code has its own rules on parents and schools. Article 221 says:
Parents and other persons exercising parental authority shall be civilly liable for the injuries and damages caused by the acts or omissions of their unemancipated children living in their company and under their parental authority subject to the appropriate defenses provided by law.
For schools, Article 218 gives the school, its administrators and teachers special parental authority over a minor child while under their supervision, instruction or custody, including authorized activities outside the school. Article 219 then says:
Those given the authority and responsibility under the preceding Article shall be principally and solidarily liable for damages caused by the acts or omissions of the unemancipated minor. The parents, judicial guardians or the persons exercising substitute parental authority over said minor shall be subsidiarily liable.
"Subsidiarily liable" means that the liability of the parents comes second, after that of the school. Article 219 also keeps a diligence defense for all of them.
What changed when the age of majority became 18?
Republic Act No. 6809 lowered the age of majority from 21 to 18. But it amended Family Code Article 236 to keep parents' and guardians' responsibility under Article 2180 for children below 21:
Nothing in this Code shall be construed to derogate from the duty or responsibility of parents and guardians for children and wards below twenty-one years of age mentioned in the second and third paragraphs of Article 2180 of the Civil Code.
For more on the age of majority, see Article 234 of the Family Code.
Frequently asked questions
Is an employer liable for an employee's accident?
Yes, if the employee was acting within the scope of his assigned tasks. Article 2180 makes employers liable for damage caused by their employees and household helpers in that case, even if the employer has no business. The employer is freed if it proves it observed all the diligence of a good father of a family to prevent the damage.
Are parents liable for damage caused by their children?
Article 2180 makes parents responsible for damage caused by their minor children who live with them. Family Code Article 221 also makes parents civilly liable for the acts of their unemancipated children living in their company and under their parental authority, subject to the defenses provided by law.
Does parents' liability end when the child turns 18?
Not completely. Article 236 of the Family Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 6809, says nothing in the Code reduces the duty or responsibility of parents and guardians under the second and third paragraphs of Article 2180 for children and wards below twenty-one.
What is the 'diligence of a good father of a family' defense?
It is the defense in the last paragraph of Article 2180. The parent, guardian, employer or teacher is not liable if he proves that he observed all the diligence of a good father of a family, meaning the care of an ordinary, careful person, to prevent the damage. Whether the proof is enough is for the court to decide.
Can the employer recover what it paid from the employee?
Yes. Article 2181 says whoever pays for the damage caused by his dependents or employees may recover from them what he has paid.
Is the government liable for damage caused by its employees?
Article 2180 says the State is liable in the same way only when it acts through a special agent. When the damage was caused by the official to whom the task properly belongs, Article 2176 applies instead.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?