Is a Verbal Agreement Binding in the Philippines?
Quick answer
Yes, in most cases. Under the Civil Code, a contract is binding "in whatever form" it was made, so a spoken agreement can be as binding as a written one. The main exception is the Statute of Frauds: some agreements, such as a lease longer than one year or a promise to pay someone else's debt, cannot be enforced in court without a note or memorandum signed by the party being sued, unless they were ratified. A case on an oral contract must be filed within six years.
Are oral contracts valid?
Yes, as a rule. Article 1356 says:
Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present.
The essential requisites are consent, an object certain and a cause (Article 1318). An agreement made by word of mouth can meet all three.
The same article adds an exception: when the law requires a contract to be in a certain form to be valid or enforceable, or to be proved in a certain way, "that requirement is absolute and indispensable." The Statute of Frauds is the best-known example.
Article 1358 also says that contracts where the amount involved is more than ₱500 "must appear in writing, even a private one", and Article 1357 lets either party compel the other to put the contract in that form once the contract is perfected. So a party to a valid oral contract can ask the other to sign a written version.
Which agreements must be in writing?
Article 1403(2), the Statute of Frauds, lists the agreements that are "unenforceable by action" unless the agreement, "or some note or memorandum, thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent". In plain words:
| Agreement | Example |
|---|---|
| (a) By its terms, not to be performed within a year from the making | A deal to deliver goods every month for three years |
| (b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage of another | "If my brother does not pay you, I will." |
| (c) Made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry | A promise to give land if the couple marries |
| (d) Sale of goods, chattels or things in action at a price of at least ₱500 | Selling a used motorcycle by word of mouth, unless the buyer accepts and receives the goods (or part of them) or pays part of the price at the time |
| (e) A lease longer than one year, or a sale of real property or an interest in it | A two-year lease of a room, the sale of a lot |
| (f) A representation as to the credit of a third person | "My cousin is good for the money, lend to him." |
The ₱500 figure in item (d) is the original 1949 amount in the Code.
(e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein;
What does "unenforceable" mean?
It means a court will not enforce the agreement by action unless it is ratified. Article 1403 opens with: "The following contracts are unenforceable, unless they are ratified". For the Statute of Frauds, it also says evidence of the agreement "cannot be received without the writing, or a secondary evidence of its contents."
How can a verbal agreement covered by the Statute of Frauds still be enforced?
By ratification. Article 1405 gives two ways:
Contracts infringing the Statute of Frauds, referred to in No. 2 of article 1403, are ratified by the failure to object to the presentation of oral evidence to prove the same, or by the acceptance of benefits under them.
So if the other side lets witnesses testify about the deal without objecting, or has accepted benefits under it, the agreement is ratified and the Statute of Frauds no longer stands in the way.
Is a verbal loan collectible?
A plain loan of money that is to be paid within a year is not on the Article 1403(2) list. The lender still has to prove the loan, for example through witnesses or records of the transfer.
Be careful with loans that are to be paid back over more than a year. Item (a) of the list covers agreements that by their terms are not to be performed within a year. How courts treat a loan where the money was already handed over is a question that depends on case law this page does not cover. A loan in a signed writing does not raise this question.
Interest is a separate issue. Under Article 1956, "No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing." A verbal promise of interest cannot be collected as interest. If the borrower is late after a demand, the lender may claim legal interest as damages (Lara's Gifts v. Midtown, 2022). See What is the legal interest rate?
How long do you have to sue on a verbal agreement?
Six years. Article 1145 says an action "Upon an oral contract" must be commenced within six years. A written contract has ten years. See How many years can you collect a debt?
How does this work in real life?
These are made-up examples to show how the rules work. They are not advice for any real case.
Leo lent his friend ₱8,000 in cash, to be paid back in three months. There is no paper. A loan payable within a year is not on the Statute of Frauds list, so the agreement can be enforced if Leo can prove it. He has six years to sue (Article 1145). He cannot claim the "5% a month" they talked about, because it was never written (Article 1956).
Marites agreed verbally to rent a room for two years. A lease for longer than one year is covered by Article 1403(2)(e). It cannot be enforced in court without a signed note or memorandum, unless it was ratified. It may be treated as ratified if, for example, the landlord has accepted rent under it (acceptance of benefits, Article 1405).
Dodong told a hardware store, "If my brother does not pay, I will pay you." That is a promise to answer for the debt of another (Article 1403(2)(b)). Without a writing signed by Dodong, the store cannot enforce the promise against him in court, unless it was ratified.
When do you need a lawyer?
Talk to a lawyer if a large amount, land, a long lease or a guarantee depends on a verbal agreement, or if you want to sue on one and the other side denies it. Proving an oral deal depends on the evidence. If you cannot afford a lawyer, see Free legal help in the Philippines.
Which provisions does this answer rest on?
Frequently asked questions
Is a verbal contract valid in the Philippines?
Usually yes. Article 1356 of the Civil Code says contracts are obligatory in whatever form they were entered into, as long as the essential requisites are present. The main exceptions are the agreements covered by the Statute of Frauds and contracts for which the law requires a special form.
What agreements must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds?
Under Article 1403(2): agreements not to be performed within a year, a promise to answer for another person's debt, agreements in consideration of marriage, sales of goods worth at least ₱500 (with exceptions), leases longer than one year, sales of real property, and representations about another person's credit.
What does unenforceable mean?
A court will not enforce the agreement by action unless it is ratified. For Statute of Frauds cases, Article 1405 says ratification happens when the other side fails to object to oral evidence of the agreement, or accepts benefits under it.
How long do I have to sue on a verbal agreement?
Six years. Article 1145 says an action upon an oral contract must be commenced within six years.
Can I collect interest on a verbal loan?
Not interest agreed only verbally. Article 1956 says no interest is due unless it was expressly stipulated in writing. If the borrower is late after a demand, legal interest may be claimed as damages.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?