Which Cases Do Not Go Through the Barangay?
Quick answer
Most disputes between individuals who live in the same city or municipality must pass through the barangay before going to court, but not all. Section 408 of the Local Government Code lists disputes the barangay Lupon has no authority over, such as cases against the government, serious offenses and disputes between people living in different cities. Section 412(b) lets some urgent cases go straight to court. Cases where relief is sought under the law on violence against women and their children (VAWC) are not mediated at the barangay.
Which disputes can the barangay not settle?
Section 408 gives the Lupon authority "to bring together the parties actually residing in the same city or municipality for amicable settlement of all disputes except" these:
| Exception (Section 408) | What it means |
|---|---|
| (a) One party is the government, or any subdivision or instrumentality of it | A complaint against a city hall, an agency or another government body does not go to the Lupon. |
| (b) One party is a public officer or employee, and the dispute relates to the performance of his or her official functions | A dispute with a public employee over his or her official work is excluded. A private dispute with the same person, such as a personal debt, is not excluded on this ground. |
| (c) Offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year or a fine exceeding ₱5,000 | More serious crimes are excluded. See the note on fines below. |
| (d) Offenses where there is no private offended party | Excluded when no private person is the offended party. |
| (e) Disputes involving real property located in different cities or municipalities | Excluded, unless the parties agree to submit them to an appropriate Lupon. |
| (f) Parties who actually reside in barangays of different cities or municipalities | Excluded, except where the barangays adjoin each other and the parties agree to submit the dispute to an appropriate Lupon. |
| (g) Other classes of disputes the President may determine, in the interest of justice or on the recommendation of the Secretary of Justice | Any such classes were not read for this page. |
Which cases may go straight to court?
Even when a dispute is within the Lupon's authority, Section 412(b) says the parties "may go directly to court" in four situations:
- The accused is under detention.
- A person has otherwise been deprived of personal liberty, calling for habeas corpus proceedings.
- The action is coupled with provisional remedies, such as a preliminary injunction, attachment, delivery of personal property, or support pendente lite (support while the case is pending).
- The action may otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations, meaning the deadline to file is about to run out.
Are VAWC cases settled at the barangay?
No. Section 33 of Republic Act No. 9262, the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act, says that Sections 410, 411, 412 and 413 of the Local Government Code "shall not apply in proceedings where relief is sought under this Act". Those are the sections on barangay mediation, conciliation, settlement and arbitration.
The same section says a Punong Barangay, a Barangay Kagawad or a court hearing a protection order application must not order, force or unduly influence the applicant to compromise or abandon any of the reliefs she asks for. The barangay can still issue a Barangay Protection Order. See How to file a VAWC case.
What about light crimes with higher fines today?
This is an open point. The ₱5,000 limit in Section 408(c) was written in 1991. Republic Act No. 10951 (2017) later raised many fines in the Revised Penal Code, including for some light offenses. Read word for word, a light offense whose maximum fine is now above ₱5,000 could fall outside the Lupon's authority.
No Supreme Court ruling or official rule read for this page settles how the cut-off now applies, so this page does not list particular light offenses as covered or not covered. Ask the barangay or the prosecutor's office how they treat a specific complaint.
Can a court send a case back to the barangay?
Yes, in some cases. Under the last paragraph of Section 408, the court where a non-criminal case outside the Lupon's authority is filed "may, at any time before trial, motu proprio refer the case to the lupon concerned for amicable settlement". Motu proprio means on the court's own initiative.
For disputes that are covered, skipping the barangay can make a court case premature. See Do I need to go to the barangay first?.
What about indigenous communities?
Section 412(c) says the customs and traditions of indigenous cultural communities "shall be applied in settling disputes between members of the cultural communities".
How does this work in real life?
These are made-up examples to show how the rules work. They are not advice for any real case.
Gloria disputes how the municipal treasurer's office handled her tax payment. One party is the government, and the dispute relates to the treasurer's official functions, so the Lupon has no authority over it (Section 408(a) and (b)).
Two brothers dispute land in Tarlac City. One lives in Manila and the other in Tarlac City. They live in different cities whose barangays do not adjoin, so the Lupon has no authority over the dispute between them (Section 408(f)).
Rina's former partner is in detention for a crime against her. Section 412(b)(1) lets the case go directly to court.
Mila asks for a protection order under RA 9262. The barangay may issue a Barangay Protection Order, but it may not push her to compromise, and the barangay settlement rules do not apply (RA 9262 Section 33).
When do you need a lawyer?
Talk to a lawyer if you are unsure whether your dispute is covered, if you need urgent relief such as an injunction or support while the case is pending, if the deadline to file is close, or if you are a victim of violence and need a protection order or a criminal case. Lawyers cannot appear for the parties at barangay hearings, but they can advise you before and after.
If you cannot afford a lawyer, see Free legal help in the Philippines.
Frequently asked questions
Which cases are not covered by barangay conciliation?
Section 408 of the Local Government Code excludes disputes where a party is the government or a public officer acting in official functions, offenses punishable by more than one year in prison or a fine above ₱5,000, offenses with no private offended party, some real property disputes and parties living in different cities or towns, and other classes set by the President.
When can I go directly to court without the barangay?
Section 412(b) allows it when the accused is under detention, when a person is deprived of liberty and habeas corpus is needed, when the case is joined with provisional remedies such as an injunction, attachment or support pendente lite, and when the case may otherwise be barred by prescription.
Does a VAWC case go to the barangay for settlement?
No. Section 33 of RA 9262 says Sections 410 to 413 of the Local Government Code do not apply where relief is sought under the VAWC law. The barangay may issue a Barangay Protection Order, but it may not push the woman to compromise.
Do companies have to go through the barangay?
The Code speaks of complaints by an individual against another individual (Section 410(a)). The rules that may say more about juridical persons were not read for this page, so it does not answer this point.
Can a court send my case to the barangay even if it is not covered?
Yes, for non-criminal cases. Under the last paragraph of Section 408, the court may, at any time before trial, refer a non-criminal case outside the Lupon's authority to the Lupon for amicable settlement.
Are light crimes with fines above ₱5,000 still covered?
This is not settled. The ₱5,000 cut-off dates from 1991, and Republic Act No. 10951 later raised many fines in the Revised Penal Code. No ruling or official rule read for this page answers how the cut-off now applies.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?