Tender-Age Presumption: Meaning in Philippine Law
Quick answer
The tender-age presumption is the rule that a child under seven years old stays with the mother when the parents separate. A court can order otherwise only if it finds compelling reasons. The rule comes from the second paragraph of Article 213 of the Family Code.
What does Article 213 say?
No child under seven years of age shall be separated from the mother unless the court finds compelling reasons to order otherwise.
The first paragraph of Article 213 covers older children. When parents separate, the court designates the parent who will exercise parental authority. It considers everything relevant, especially the choice of a child over seven, unless the chosen parent is unfit.
What counts as a compelling reason?
In Pablo-Gualberto v. Gualberto (2005), the Supreme Court said the presumption may be overcome only by compelling evidence of the mother's unfitness. It listed instances in which a mother has been found unfit: neglect, abandonment, unemployment, immorality, habitual drunkenness, drug addiction, maltreatment of the child, insanity, or a communicable disease.
The Court also said that "sexual preference or moral laxity alone does not prove parental neglect or incompetence." To take custody from the mother on that basis, the father must clearly show that her conduct has hurt the child's welfare or kept her from caring for the child properly. In that case the Court reinstated a trial court order that gave the mother custody of their four-year-old son while the case was pending.
Does it apply if the parents were never married?
Yes. In Masbate v. Relucio (2018), the Supreme Court said Article 213 does not distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate children. For a child born outside marriage, the mother also has sole parental authority under Article 176. See Who has custody of an illegitimate child?.
Example
Made-up illustration: Ana and Mark, a married couple, separate. Their son is four. Mark says Ana works night shifts and should not keep the boy. Working nights is not, by itself, one of the reasons the Supreme Court has listed. Unless Mark shows a compelling reason, such as neglect or maltreatment of the child, the court will usually keep the boy with Ana. Once he is older than seven, the court will also consider his own choice.
For the full answer, including visits and mediation, see Who gets custody of a child under 7?.
Which provisions use this term?
Which Supreme Court rulings are relevant?
Frequently asked questions
Can a father get custody of a child under seven?
Only if the court finds compelling reasons. In Pablo-Gualberto v. Gualberto (2005), the Supreme Court said the presumption may be overcome only by compelling evidence that the mother is unfit.
Does the rule apply to children born outside marriage?
Yes. In Masbate v. Relucio (2018), the Supreme Court said the second paragraph of Article 213 does not distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate children.
What happens when the child is older than seven?
The presumption covers only children under seven. For older children, the court designates the parent who will exercise parental authority. Under Article 213 it takes into account all relevant considerations, especially the choice of the child over seven, unless the parent chosen is unfit. The child's choice is considered, but the court decides.
Is a custody order permanent?
No. In Pablo-Gualberto v. Gualberto the Supreme Court said that temporary custody is provisional, and that even custody awarded after a judgment annulling a marriage is not permanent: it may be re-examined if the parent who has custody becomes unfit.
General information, not legal advice. For your case, ask a lawyer, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) or the agency.
Was this page helpful?